Although it's a different part of the world, I'd like to see you label all the different collection points of each of the various tropheus and petrochromis species as just tropheus x or petrochromis y. Those collection points vary so greatly that most don't resemble one another in the slightest, but are still the same species. Collection points are HIGHLY valuable when it comes to naming. Collection points show where that fish's lineage, or the fish itself is from, and generally those collection points dictate that there is a physiological difference in the color, shape, pattern, personality, etc from others of the same species. To say that they don't matter is ridiculous and asinine. And to say WC doesn't matter is ridiculous too. Malawian peacocks, although not my thing, are a perfect example of this. Take an WC or an F1 and compare it to an individual that is far from it's wild caught counterparts. The body shape tends to be very different, due to selective breeding to bring out the colors. Since no focus was put on breeding the correct body shape, but rather the fish with the best colors, many have developed a much rounder shape than wild peacocks.
Sent from my iPhone using Aquarium Advice