aquarium advice logo

Go Back   Aquarium Advice - Aquarium & Reef Forum > Saltwater and Reef > Saltwater Reef Aquaria
Portal Register Forums Articles Gallery Reviews FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-30-2006, 05:08 PM   #1
SeeDemTails
Aquarium Advice Freak
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Daytona Beach FL
Posts: 436
Images: 4
SeeDemTails has fishy dreams
Dosing......Minus the volume of LR?

Should you minus the volume of LR in your tank when calculateing you dosing? I have always wondered and figured I would ask!
SeeDemTails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2006, 05:28 PM   #2
melosu58
SW 10 yrs and over
Community Moderator
 
melosu58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Richmond Va
Posts: 12,135
Images: 76
melosu58 is a friend to many fishmelosu58 is a friend to many fishmelosu58 is a friend to many fishmelosu58 is a friend to many fishmelosu58 is a friend to many fishmelosu58 is a friend to many fish
I dont know weekly PWC`s take care of my tank. No dosing needed. If you are going to dose then under dosing is always best.
melosu58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2006, 06:34 PM   #3
roka64
Aquarium Advice Addict
Community Moderator
 
roka64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,329
Images: 12
roka64 swims with mermaidsroka64 swims with mermaidsroka64 swims with mermaidsroka64 swims with mermaidsroka64 swims with mermaidsroka64 swims with mermaids
Send a message via AIM to roka64 Send a message via Yahoo to roka64
I agree with melosu58, consistant PWC should replenish the depleted nutrience. I believe at least one exception to this rule, is if you have coral "overload", as in, your corals suck up more nutrience than are in the tank...but, I believe if this were the case, more frequent PWCs would probably work just as well.
If you mean stuff like, zoe/selcon and other food additives, just go with the volume of the tank.
__________________
Uh-oh, I just overloaded my Bioload!

Questions loved, heeded advice greatly appreciated!

Vote for AA
Good reading about:
Nitrogen Cycle
Fishless Cycling
Need more help?
Articles
Acronym List

--Scott
roka64 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2006, 07:04 PM   #4
SeeDemTails
Aquarium Advice Freak
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Daytona Beach FL
Posts: 436
Images: 4
SeeDemTails has fishy dreams
I have been using kent nano reef for my nano tank for some time, and my corals are doing well. My SPS frag (Purple Tip Acro, A. Vaughani or something!?) has done very well in less than 2 months it has good growth.

The bottle says 2 drops per gal.....whish would be 20 drops for my tank, but I have lots of LR so I only put 15 drops in, and all seems well, for almost a year now. I took my water to my LFS and had them check the strontium, magnesium, iodine and calcium and the dude said everything is where it needs to be.
SeeDemTails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2006, 04:04 AM   #5
MT79
Aquarium Advice Addict
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: philadelphia. PA.
Posts: 2,655
Images: 23
MT79 has fishy dreams
Quote:
The bottle says 2 drops per gal
They don't know whether you have one coral or ten, amount of LR, etc., etc. If you have stoney corals or clam(s), especially SPS, you should monitor the CA/Alk values and calculate the daily usage of both. This will allow you to keep water parameters optimal and steady. This dosing calculator may help make things easier- http://jdieck1.home.comcast.net/chemcalc.html
FWIW I prefer two part ionically balanced CA and Alk additives such as B-Ionic or the Aqua-C brand. They also contain other neccesary elemets such as magnesium, etc. in appropriate portions to each other.
Quote:
Should you minus the volume of LR in your tank when calculateing you dosing?
LR takes up space and therefore affects the systems total volume of water. It should be taken into account when dosing. There is a calculator some where online that gives an approx. amount of water that X amount of LR displaces. I'll post it if I find it.
__________________
Mike
MT79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2006, 09:53 AM   #6
melosu58
SW 10 yrs and over
Community Moderator
 
melosu58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Richmond Va
Posts: 12,135
Images: 76
melosu58 is a friend to many fishmelosu58 is a friend to many fishmelosu58 is a friend to many fishmelosu58 is a friend to many fishmelosu58 is a friend to many fishmelosu58 is a friend to many fish
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeDemTails
I took my water to my LFS and had them check the strontium, magnesium, iodine and calcium and the dude said everything is where it needs to be.
This could easily be done with PWC`s.
melosu58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tank volume Snotman Saltwater & Reef - Getting Started 3 03-13-2007 11:49 PM
Im back... but minus 2 fish =o( lyquidphyre Freshwater & Brackish - General Discussion 6 06-10-2005 03:31 PM
main volume + sump volume = more fish????? Dr.Nate Saltwater & Reef - Archive 3 05-17-2005 04:54 PM
T minus 3 1/2 hours till American Idol 4!! lmw80 The Lounge 5 01-18-2005 07:20 PM
Actual volume=tank volume-displacement from gravel, rocks... afFISHionado Freshwater & Brackish - General Discussion 4 08-20-2003 12:37 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:21 PM.



Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Yoga Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - U2 Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0