gozetec02 said:
But those tanks are very deep they would need lots of light to reach all the way to the bottom at optimum intensity. If a 24" deep tank needs 130 watts for opitimum intensity wouln't a tank half the depth require half the light?
Take a look at this
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/vision/isql.html#c1
I'd have to disagree with the statement that a 24" deep tank needs 130 watts for optimum intensity. The depth of the tank is a major factor, but watts of light aren't the best measurement. Several members here have 55
gal tanks with 2x250w
MH systems and are reporting excellent results. You will not put enough artificial light on a tank to approximate the natural sunlight that the reefs get. 400w
MH systems are not uncommon on 24" deep tanks. I know of one tank, 32" deep, that uses four 400w
MH's and three 1000w
MH's. Since we're talking about 20g tanks though, I had a coral prop tank with 190w of
PC over it. It did require a fan to keep the water temp down, but coral growth was excellent. Anyway, lighting is a controversial subject and it really depends on what kind of lighting you have. 250w of
MH is not equal to 250w of
PC or
VHO. The
MH is much more intense because it is concentrated over a smaller area. In the end, it depends on what you want to keep in the tank. If you're just going to have soft corals, you don't need
MH. If you intend to have
SPS, although you can keep them under fluorescent lighting,
MH tends to be much better.