PassengerTN
Aquarium Advice Addict
Yep. Taiwan, HK, and other Asian countries seem to love sb & balloon variety of fish. There are quite a few on MFK.
Jesse
Jesse
I just googled it, it's horrible.
Here's a stubby Asian aro
Sent from my 5560S using Aquarium Advice mobile app
I just googled it, it's horrible.
Here's a stubby Asian aro
Sent from my 5560S using Aquarium Advice mobile app
I honestly think that in terms of creating fish outside of their natural form (Ballon versions, long fin, etc.) by far the worst offense is intentional hybridization. Flower horns, blood parrots, and red Texas cichlids are commonly sold hybrid CA cichlids that muddy gene pools of wild type versions of their parents in captivity. It is ask becoming increasingly hard for hobbyists to locate true un-hybridized versions of many fish nowadays. While a ballon version of a fish or a long fin version of a fish that struggles to swim are bad in and of themselves they do not pose a threat to the survival of their species. Hybrid fish do in some way or another threaten their wild counterparts. For these reasons I believe that more attention should go towards the persecution of intentional hybridization instead of the creation of Ballon, Dyed, Unnatural forms of fish even though I find these practices rather unethical as well. While many of us here would never own a dyed/tattooed fish many people here embrace the intentional hybridization of fish and support the practice by purchasing and maintaining these man made fish. Ill get off my soapbox now.
Really? Its worse to breed fish that form healthy hybrids than to breed odd shaped monsters that can barely swim? Get off the hybrid bandwagon and realize that any form of breeding that creates these monstrosities is wrong!
Is there such thing as wild hybrids?
Sent from my SM-G360T1 using Aquarium Advice mobile app
Yes, breeding ballon versions of fish who are physically deformed is wrong and should stop. But I believe that it is worse to breed hybrid cichlids for several reasons. Blood parrots usually can't close their mouths and have very oddly shared bodies and often are afflicted by physical deformities. Just about the same as that Arowana (Horrible by the way ) but to add insult to injury hybrids are a threat to the survival of many cichlid species who are not only becoming increasingly rare in the wild but are only maintained in their pure form by very few responsible hobbyists. Causing the gene pool to become a giant blob of several different species is threatening the survival of many cichlid species who are endangered in the natural habitat as their aquarium kept counter parts are crossed with other species causing the pure form of the species to go extinct, both in captivity and potentially in the wild. I'm sorry but you cannot call yourself a real, informed aquarist if you support intentional hybridization. Not only does it sometimes create deformed physically feeble fish but it also threatens to doom many species who rely on aquarists to keep them alive albeit in captivity. I don't want to fight over this. I am done talking about it on this thread. If you want to continue this conversation PM me.
No, occasionally fish can naturally hybridize but it is very rare.
Is there such thing as wild hybrids?
Sent from my SM-G360T1 using Aquarium Advice mobile app
That's why people are fascinated by hybrids, it's a product of what could be...
Sent from my SM-G360T1 using Aquarium Advice mobile app
Not necessarily, a lot of hybrids are the crossing of species that would never run into each other in the wild.
Sent from my 5560S using Aquarium Advice mobile app
Ive debated about hybrids before, but i feel that its fine to buy, sell, and breed them as long as they are marketed truthfully and sold to intelligent people... As I've said before, if people want a for-sure pure fish, they usually don't just go to the LFS to get one. So even if these fish aren't marketed properly, they will only hurt other fish that are known to be pure by stupid people who will go and buy a fish that is usually a higher price and a known pure-bred, and breed it with a fish that is more than likely a hybrid...
Not sure if that makes sense? Thats my opinion on it, if anyone understands that mess of words i just created.
If money cant buy happiness, that why do I need a job? I mean, I should be getting these fish free, since I don't have to pay for happy...
Are we all doing wrong even keeping fish in a glass cage that
doesn't resemble anything like their proper freedom, and so it goes on and on.......so what the heck do we do, we are in the sh## anyway......
I promise you that in a properly sized tank with adequate care most fish can live a 100% normal healthy life. Notice that I said most. Some fish are just better off left in the wild but the vast majority of fish can life perfect lives in aquaria. I used to think like you did. But after thinking more I came to the conclusion that there is nothing wrong with keeping fish in aquariums under a few circumstances:
#1) Keeping a certain fish in a tank is not harming the wild population significantly.
#2) The tank is large enough for the fish to exhibit somewhat natural behavior.
#3) The fish is offered a proper diet and care.
Under these few rules you can usually tell if a fish is going to live a good life in an aquarium. But I get were you are getting at. There have been several threads about the ethics of the hobby that have reached 20-30 pages of replies.