Hi,
So i'm getting ready to start cycling my 45 and i've been considering what lights to get. The tank is 36" by 18" and the two options i've been considering are Metal Halides and VHOs. For a Metal Halide setup I could get the ballast for a 250W bulb for about $85, i'm sure the fixture would amount to $15 or so, and the bulb for about $100. So that puts me at an intitial cost of $200 to set up a Metal Halide system (Not including the hood i'll build). On the VHO side I can get an Icecap 600 and the fixtures/mounting for $100 from a friend even. Now the bulbs appear to cost about $25 give or take and i'd be doing 3 96 watt bulbs, 1 50/50 actnic and 2 10k white. That puts at an initial cost of $175 for the VHO's.
Now looking at some of the hour ratings on these metal halides the average life seems to be about 7500 hours, which means if I have a 12 hour day cycle that would put me at 1.75 years per bulb or for an 8 hour cycle
2.65 years per bulb. So just to take an estimate let's say 2 years per bulb. So $50 a year physical cost (not electrical) for metal halides. It seems you need to replace VHO bulbs about every 6 months so that means $150 a year for 3 bulbs in my case.
My question i suppose is, am I looking at this correctly? Are Metal Halides really the more cost effective solution? Or does the power consumption even it out? My friend also suggested some other configurations, perhaps one metal halide and an actinic together. Please let me know what your take is on this.
Regards,
Ken
So i'm getting ready to start cycling my 45 and i've been considering what lights to get. The tank is 36" by 18" and the two options i've been considering are Metal Halides and VHOs. For a Metal Halide setup I could get the ballast for a 250W bulb for about $85, i'm sure the fixture would amount to $15 or so, and the bulb for about $100. So that puts me at an intitial cost of $200 to set up a Metal Halide system (Not including the hood i'll build). On the VHO side I can get an Icecap 600 and the fixtures/mounting for $100 from a friend even. Now the bulbs appear to cost about $25 give or take and i'd be doing 3 96 watt bulbs, 1 50/50 actnic and 2 10k white. That puts at an initial cost of $175 for the VHO's.
Now looking at some of the hour ratings on these metal halides the average life seems to be about 7500 hours, which means if I have a 12 hour day cycle that would put me at 1.75 years per bulb or for an 8 hour cycle
2.65 years per bulb. So just to take an estimate let's say 2 years per bulb. So $50 a year physical cost (not electrical) for metal halides. It seems you need to replace VHO bulbs about every 6 months so that means $150 a year for 3 bulbs in my case.
My question i suppose is, am I looking at this correctly? Are Metal Halides really the more cost effective solution? Or does the power consumption even it out? My friend also suggested some other configurations, perhaps one metal halide and an actinic together. Please let me know what your take is on this.
Regards,
Ken