Not sure if I'm posting in the right section since it's more a question of morality but.. If you had fish tuberculosis in a tank of yours, what would you do? Leave it be or euthanize all the fish? Everyone I've asked and everything I've read says it's uncurable, that some symptoms can be treated but not the disease itself.
The reason I'm asking is cause I've got a 16 gallon with something that I'm pretty sure is fish TB after ruling out everything else and I'm trying to decide what's the more humane thing to do. After the initial onset about 10 months ago when I lost 6 fish in this particular tank and it wiped out my entire 29 gallon, I've lost about one fish every couple of months. I just had to euthanize the latest, a male apisto borelli. I don't want to add more fish (to keep the shoals complete) and expose them to this disease cause I'm fairly sure every single fish I have in there are carriers of the disease even if they are currently not showing any symptoms, but it also seems wrong to me to just wait for them to develop severe symptoms before euthanizing them or letting them die on their own.
The reason I'm asking is cause I've got a 16 gallon with something that I'm pretty sure is fish TB after ruling out everything else and I'm trying to decide what's the more humane thing to do. After the initial onset about 10 months ago when I lost 6 fish in this particular tank and it wiped out my entire 29 gallon, I've lost about one fish every couple of months. I just had to euthanize the latest, a male apisto borelli. I don't want to add more fish (to keep the shoals complete) and expose them to this disease cause I'm fairly sure every single fish I have in there are carriers of the disease even if they are currently not showing any symptoms, but it also seems wrong to me to just wait for them to develop severe symptoms before euthanizing them or letting them die on their own.