cwt
Aquarium Advice FINatic
mmm, yeah, I like these results WAY better. 136 points, like it should be. Not too bad considering I lost Ryan Grant after week 1.
I'm reporting this thread. Week 2 should be stricken from the books.
its not fair that the vikings D sucked that much!!!! i knew i should of played the colts d instead >____>
its already filled =P we started this about a month ago lol
only one slot for D, i had the colts d on week 2 sitting on my bench, i didnt think eli would of been ripted that much, and the vikings D against a team that was not better than the giants starting on my team =[
I've never heard of "bench points" you get points for not playing the right guys? Just use fractional points and you won't have ties. I like just having bench open, if you want two D's so be it. And if you think there is no difference in having a good D or picking up the scraps for a week then you must have a league with 4 people in it.
I understand the scenario, just don't agree. And I guess it is easy to score 13 points for a rb in your leagues, thats the equivalent of 130 yards or more in any league i've ever played in. To get this out of every 5 or more players on the bench may require a heck of a week. Your 4th best RB isn't in question, but your other bench players can't be that good. I'll take that steady 7-10 guarenteed every week. ****, kickers score can score 150+ points a year, why not load up? Doubt you can get that out of a thirteenth round flier. And what about byes? Not saying I would do this, but just exposing holes in the logic of bench stats lol. I digress as I realize I have better things to finish up than argue fantasy football scoring in an aquarium forum lol
I like fractional points because every yard counts.