So much for innocent until proven guilty.
That's the thing though, in this country if you get accused of something your name is out everywhere (wether it be a local paper or national media depending on the crime, who you are, what the media decides is important that week etc.) and once your name is out there for doing something most people assume your guilt from the get go. Ask that guy that was accused of setting off the bomb in that park during the olympics in Atlanta about that. So if we want people to be innocent until proven guilty in this country we would protect the identity of the accused as well as the accuser.
As far as this case goes, I don't know what evidance was out there during the trial so yeah maybe i was a little quick with my "you can do what ever you want in this country as long as you have money" comment, but IMO
the guy is guilty of doing inapropriate things to children from things i have read and heard before.