aqua_chem
Aquarium Advice Addict
Technically we do not know for sure which nutrients cause which symptoms as the plant charts we use for troubleshooting are based on terrestrial plants that are not carbon limited.
Two things here. One, many of the infographics available are derived from aquatic plants specifically, and there are a lot of examples of specific deficiencies available out there. But more importantly, isolated deficiencies are fairly rare. It's hard for someone to definitively say 'that's 100% an iron deficiency' because if they're short on one micronutrient, they're probably very low on other micronutrients and potassium (and likely carbon as well). That's why I think's it's better (and easier) to say 'you have deficiencies, even though I think it's probably xxxx you should shore up all your nutrients just in case'. There's also the problem where if you're carbon limited and you add a bunch of carbon, you're suddenly going to be limited by something else real quickly, and you might end up worse off.
In the words of Mr Barr 'assuming that all of our plants and their issues are the same is not a good assumption. Co2 should be addressed well before nutrients'
Well, yea, but that's coming from EI's biggest advocate. There's also nothing saying you need to address one thing at a time.
However, even if we were to use these charts as accepted consensus there have been no reports of yellowing leaves that would signify nitrogen or iron deficiency. There is no report of green spot algae on leaves that would suggest phosphate deficiency. There is no report of holes in leaves that would indicate potassium deficiency, there is no report of dark veins which may indicate magnesium deficiency etc etc. In fact the only real reports are structural deformities, small leaves and stunted to no growth which does (according to these charts) indicate a co2 deficiency.
With the exception of GSA, I can see all of those actually. There is quite a bit of yellowing throughout, even accounting for washout from the camera.