Go Back   Aquarium Advice - Aquarium Forum Community > General Aquarium Forums > General Hardware/Equipment Discussion
Click Here to Login

Join Aquarium Advice Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on AquariumAdvice.com
 
Old 02-27-2006, 10:32 PM   #1
Aquarium Advice FINatic
 
GouramiFanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 598
Fluval 404 vs Rena Filstar XP2

I'm currently planning on setting up a 75 gallon freshwater community tank. It will consist mainly of peaceful to semi-aggressive (as some are labeled) fish with a Sailfin Pleco. I'm not planning on overstocking or having live plants or anything like that. I'll be putting in normal gravel with some rock and/or slate decorations, also probably some terra cotta pots.

I'm looking at two different canister filters, but I'm unsure of which is better and easier to maintain. I don't really mind having to set time aside to clean the filter, but at the same time I honestly have no clue how to clean a canister filter yet (I'll be reading much more on this subject).

With that said, here are the two filters that I'm currently looking at.

Rena Filstar XP2 and Fluval 404 304

Going by looks alone, I prefer the Filstar. I'd like to get your thoughts and opinions on these filters and which one would be better for my type of setup. Also, how difficult are these things to clean? How much disassembling is there? Any other words of wisdom is welcome!
__________________

__________________
75G- (3) Firemouth Cichlids, (10) Tiger Barbs, (3) Dojo Loaches, (3) Yoyo Loaches, and (1) Sailfin Pleco.
46G- (3) Pearl Gouramis, (5) Black Skirt Tetras, (7) Harlequin Rasboras, (3) Dojo Loaches, (1) Clown Pleco
GouramiFanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2006, 11:37 PM   #2
Aquarium Advice Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 1,538
I've seen demos on Rena filters and other equipment and I tend to like Rena better. Better made and easier to maintain. Worth any extra costs on their products. Have you thought about a small wet/dry or sump type filter? Easier to deal with and the heaters can go in it instead of the tank.
__________________

__________________
http://www.tricitytropicals.com
------------------------------------
We, as a people, know so much more about outer space than we do about our own oceans. This lack of knowledge can very well spell the dangers that lay in wait for us.

The oceans surely would swallow us before a rock comes down to smite the planet of it's life.
Nov/2004
TCTFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 06:30 PM   #3
Aquarium Advice Freak
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chandler,Az
Posts: 288
For a 75 gallon I would go with either the XP-3 or 404 the 304/XP-2 wouldn't be enough.On my 80 I run a 404 and a XP-2 but it is moderately planted so the 2 filters give me a little better circulation.
__________________
80 gallon FW:3 clown loaches, 2 angels, bloodfin tetras and 1 albino BN pleco,1 Farlowella.
46 gallon FW: kuhli loaches, otos, black neon and black phantom tetras, 3 pitbull plecos.
50 gallon SW: 1 green spotted puffer
penpitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 11:13 PM   #4
Aquarium Advice FINatic
 
GouramiFanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 598
Thanks for the input. The XP3 won't be overkill in a 75 gallon? I don't want to overfilter my tank if it means that something may end up going wrong.

What's the main difference between a Canister Filter and a HOB?
__________________
75G- (3) Firemouth Cichlids, (10) Tiger Barbs, (3) Dojo Loaches, (3) Yoyo Loaches, and (1) Sailfin Pleco.
46G- (3) Pearl Gouramis, (5) Black Skirt Tetras, (7) Harlequin Rasboras, (3) Dojo Loaches, (1) Clown Pleco
GouramiFanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2006, 02:54 AM   #5
Aquarium Advice Addict
 
Lonewolfblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wenatchee, WA
Posts: 8,435
Send a message via ICQ to Lonewolfblue Send a message via Yahoo to Lonewolfblue
I have an XP3 on my 75G planted. Does a great job, and with using the spraybar, the current is perfect for a planted tank.

The difference is the filter itself isn't visible, and with a cannister, you have much more media choices you can use. I have my XP3 outfitted with sponges, ceramic cylinders, lava granules, media stars, floss, and the fine micro-filter pad.
__________________
55G Filstar XP3 - 16" Fire Eel
75G Medium Planted - Filstar XP3 Low Light - Established Feb 2006
Lonewolfblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
filstar, fluval, rena, val

Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on AquariumAdvice.com

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rena Filstar xp2 Julie Stuva General Hardware/Equipment Discussion 3 04-27-2009 09:14 AM
RENA Filstar XP2 usmcmarc Archive 0 02-25-2008 08:12 PM
FS: Rena Filstar xp2 - PA Archive 0 01-30-2006 05:20 PM
Help w/ Rena Filstar XP2!! -- Update JenNewbie General Hardware/Equipment Discussion 7 11-03-2004 01:58 PM
Set-up of a Rena Filstar XP2 cushingme Saltwater Reef Aquaria 1 01-22-2004 12:32 AM







» Photo Contest Winners








Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.