Go Back   Aquarium Advice - Aquarium Forum Community > General Aquarium Forums > General Hardware/Equipment Discussion
Click Here to Login

Join Aquarium Advice Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on AquariumAdvice.com
 
Old 09-11-2013, 10:48 AM   #11
Aquarium Advice Addict
 
Dallascowboys16's Avatar

POTM Champion
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Highlands Ranch, Co
Posts: 1,772
I had an ehiem 2117 and hated it so bought a fluval 406 and I'm much happier with it. The inside of the fluval looks like a space ship and makes mainanence so much easier with the valves and the media sections on the inside. My vote is for the fluval 06 series.
__________________

__________________
55 gallon Planted Tank - 10 gallon Reef - 5.5 Pea Puffer
2015 AA Fantasy Football Champion
Dallascowboys16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 11:52 AM   #12
Aquarium Advice Addict
 
molliwopp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Uk, England.
Posts: 2,110
You had an eheim2217 and hated it.. why? Or are you just joining the 06 bandwagen. If youve had and used both. What do you think are the pros the fluval has, that you actually use to solve a problem?

With the eheim 2217 you dont have to buy anything seperatly afterwards either. The supplied media in the 406 isnt enough by anyones standards and if you want spray bar you have to pay for it.

If you havent had and used both then youre obviously going to back the one youve bought and rightly so.
Biologically the eheims are without arguement superior. Infact if the 2215 had a more powerful pump it would also biologically be more sound than the 406, there just isnt much space inside the 06 series!! Neither are bad filter but the eheim 2217 definitely edges it.

Theyre both good, If youre looking for more flow, less media, flow control with a tiny chance of leaks or faults and dont mind buying extras the fluval 406 is the one for you.

If youre looking for heavy biological fitration and moderate flow and dont want to buy extra media or spray bar with an even smaller chance of brake down, the eheim 2217 is the one for you.
__________________

__________________
Fish die belly upward and rise to the surface. It's their way of falling.


[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
molliwopp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 12:26 PM   #13
Aquarium Advice Activist
 
bsantucci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by molliwopp View Post
You had an eheim2217 and hated it.. why? Or are you just joining the 06 bandwagen. If youve had and used both. What do you think are the pros the fluval has, that you actually use to solve a problem?

With the eheim 2217 you dont have to buy anything seperatly afterwards either. The supplied media in the 406 isnt enough by anyones standards and if you want spray bar you have to pay for it.

If you havent had and used both then youre obviously going to back the one youve bought and rightly so.
Biologically the eheims are without arguement superior. Infact if the 2215 had a more powerful pump it would also biologically be more sound than the 406, there just isnt much space inside the 06 series!! Neither are bad filter but the eheim 2217 definitely edges it.

Theyre both good, If youre looking for more flow, less media, flow control with a tiny chance of leaks or faults and dont mind buying extras the fluval is the one for you.

If youre looking for heavy biological fitration and moderate flow with a small chance of brake down, the eheim 2217 is the one for you.
I'm still fairly new to this, but wouldn't the biological point be moot unless you're comparing the same exact fish stocking? I mean, the tank is going to only provide as much bacteria as needed based on what is stocked in the tank. So having all this extra media is redundant if you're not stocked heavy enough to blanket everything in bacteria.

That being said, For the size tanks the 406 is rated for, I'd say there's more than enough space to have enough media for the any stocking level you would have.
__________________
bsantucci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 01:05 PM   #14
Aquarium Advice Addict
Community Moderator
 
Brian_Nano12g's Avatar



POTM Champion
Tank of the Month Award
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 6,146
The media and sponges that the fluval 06 cans come with are fine and are quite capable of filtering efficiently and effectively straight out of the box. There is "extra" space for those who like to customize and add in their own filtering media. For instance, the only thing I added was some Purigen and a layer of filter floss, only because I like that extra level of polishing. My water in my tanks are crystal clear.

Another one of my biggest upsell in getting the fluval 06 is the ability to have a flow control. I researched the Eheim heavily and even contacted their customer support because I was seriously considering one at one point... I was told that there's no flow control and if I attempted to restrict the flow with the quick disconnects, I would burn out the motor and/or reduce its longevity. Conversely, the fluval is designed with the flow control option in mind and has no impact on burning out the motor. This was key to me because I like to be over-filtered and reducing the flow while having the extra capacity was advantageous.

Spray bar vs. Spray nozzle, that's no biggie. Both companies sell accessories that don't come with the filter initially. It's easily upgraded and changed. I even swapped out the ribbed fluval hosing on one of my fluvals to clear vinyl tubing to accommodate some glass Lily pipes on my rimless tank.

They are both great companies when it comes to filtration. You'll have happy owners on both ends. But making blanket statements saying that the fluval's media isn't enough "by anyone's standards" is a bold statement and sounds like it's based on anecdotal assumptions. I just find that the fluval has more features that the eheim classic cans don't. I'm not knocking eheim as a bad filter by any stretch, but I just don't see how it's superior other than the no bypass single stack design. Even if my fluval allows some bypass or not, my water is always crystal with it. Everything else about the eheim makes it cumbersome and falls short in features, IMHO.

Edit: but despite how I feel or others that use a fluval 06 can, this is your thread and you're entitled to "your own" opinion. I just wanted to play devils advocate due to the one-sided tone of it.
__________________
- [ADA 60P] - [ADA 60F] - [GLA 6g] - [26g] - [2.1g Cube]
Brian_Nano12g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 05:39 PM   #15
Aquarium Advice Addict
 
molliwopp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Uk, England.
Posts: 2,110
As strange as it sounds i like my 406. Another plus for 406 is that it is that its easier to set up.
__________________
Fish die belly upward and rise to the surface. It's their way of falling.


[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
molliwopp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 05:40 PM   #16
Aquarium Advice Activist
 
bsantucci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by molliwopp View Post
As strange as it sounds i like my 406. Another plus for 406 is that it is that its easier to set up.
Hah, it certainly sounded like you were against it from yours posts. What caused the turnaround?
__________________
bsantucci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 07:41 PM   #17
Aquarium Advice Addict
 
molliwopp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Uk, England.
Posts: 2,110
No turnaround i just wanted to make sure i was being understood and didnt want to give the impression i was against fluval. Im still alittle upset i have to buy extra media though because the 2 bags of biomax only fill one side of one media tray. Also 4 bags of carbon could be considered too many. But im happy because now i can run one bag every 2month.. 4 bags = 8months of carbon or i may run one every 3 months for a month.. extend that to a year of carbon. I bought 300grams of bio rings off ebay i just hope its enough. Might need alittle more.
__________________
Fish die belly upward and rise to the surface. It's their way of falling.


[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
molliwopp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 07:57 PM   #18
Aquarium Advice Addict
Community Moderator
 
Brian_Nano12g's Avatar



POTM Champion
Tank of the Month Award
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 6,146
Is there a particular reason you're running carbon? A lot of seasoned hobbyist tend to forgo using it unless you're trying to remove chemicals, metals, or meds that you may have used to treat the tank with. Otherwise, it's omitted as an additive in normal use. Instead of using carbon, you should consider using Purigen instead. You wouldn't have to buy new Purigen after it's been used. You simply "recharge" it by using Bleach and then Prime. It's very effective at removing nitrogenous organic waste.

As for the biomax... it's really not that expensive to buy more. In some cases, you may not 'need' more. This highly depends on the bioload of your tank. Are you even testing the parameters occasionally when your tank is stocked each time? You may already have enough bio media for BB to develop enough colonies to process the ammonia and nitrites for what you have already. Just because there's extra space doesn't mean you need to fill in every nook and cranny. Moreover, you should never have to replace the media once it's in there. You can simply rinse it out occasionally as you would your sponges in siphoned out tank water. Are you in the habit of replacing all your media several months out of the year?
__________________
- [ADA 60P] - [ADA 60F] - [GLA 6g] - [26g] - [2.1g Cube]
Brian_Nano12g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 08:05 PM   #19
Aquarium Advice Addict
 
molliwopp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Uk, England.
Posts: 2,110
Im in no habbit of changing media only the cleaning, and never use carbon unless medicating like you said.

Ill be needing more media eventually so better to buy it now. This 406 will be on a 65 demasoni mbuna species tank.
__________________
Fish die belly upward and rise to the surface. It's their way of falling.


[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
molliwopp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 11:32 PM   #20
Aquarium Advice Freak
 
agrasyuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: NW Chicago Burbs
Posts: 211
thank you , i was just looking at these two choices as replacement for rena XP2. i will admit i am leaning towards a 306 (for 55 Gal tank)

perhaps of topic,
rena had awesome reviews, but greeted me with a leak... if the 4 latches are fully locked i strongly believe there should not be any slight possibility for a leak, and if i screwed it up and got misaligned seal then it should be impossible to lock! i understand new filters can keep the water cloudy for a week, but the water is full of tiny debris . which makes me suspect inner gasket migt be letting unfiltered stuff through. water level inside also dropped, which means it is not air tight... waiting for rena tech support to respond , if not amazon says they will take it back for a full refund even thoguh it is open and wet.
__________________

__________________
agrasyuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on AquariumAdvice.com

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off








» Photo Contest Winners








Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.