Go Back   Aquarium Advice - Aquarium Forum Community > General Aquarium Forums > General Hardware/Equipment Discussion
Click Here to Login

Join Aquarium Advice Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on AquariumAdvice.com
 
Old 01-21-2006, 03:11 AM   #1
Aquarium Advice Activist
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 121
HOB versus undergravel filter

Is there a difference in filter efficiency between HOB and undergravel filter. I sometimes even see a combination between the two. For which aquarium types or sizes is one to be preferred versus the other?
__________________

__________________
carpediem
carpediem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2006, 08:44 AM   #2
Aquarium Advice Addict
 
Fishyfanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 11,964
HOB's are definately more effectient than ugfs. I would not recommend a ugf for any tank. Even fry tanks I'd use a sponge filter or a mini hob.
__________________

__________________
Vote for Aquarium Advice

29 Gallon Lake Malawi Fry
55 Gallon Community
150 Gallon Lake Malawi Cichlid
Fishyfanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2006, 09:09 AM   #3
Aquarium Advice Addict
 
TomK2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Glen Ellyn, IL
Posts: 2,085
HOB or canister, IMO, are better choices, and they are good enough as stand alone filters. No need to combine them with anything else, provided you match the size with your tank.
__________________
TomK2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2006, 07:21 PM   #4
Aquarium Advice Activist
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 121
Ok. Now that I have heard that HOB is to be preferred, I am still unclear of the reason why. Is it the water amount that is being filtered or is it something else.

The 30 gal octagonal is probably still too small for a pleco, but other than guppies and platies, neons, corys, what else could be added to give it an overall colorful and evenly spread tank?

By the way, it is nice to be back.
__________________
carpediem
carpediem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2006, 07:37 PM   #5
Aquarium Advice Addict
 
Zagz's Avatar



POTM Champion
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,108
Send a message via MSN to Zagz
UGF's are nitrate factories. They gunk gets trapped under the filter plates, even with regular vac's and nitrates go through the roof. They are more difficult to clean thoroughly as well. I've removed UGF's from tanks and was blown away by all the gunk that doesn't get vac'd out.
__________________
AA Community Rules | AA TOS

-----------
Site Administrator
Zagz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2006, 08:47 PM   #6
Aquarium Advice Addict
 
Lonewolfblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wenatchee, WA
Posts: 8,435
Send a message via ICQ to Lonewolfblue Send a message via Yahoo to Lonewolfblue
I would agree with what Zagz just said, they are nitrate factories, and can create anaerobic pockets in the system if not cleaned properly. And about the only proper cleaning is a complete teardown.

As for colorful fish, there's cherry barbs, various tetras, various rasboras, dwarf gouramis (if you get a couple, watch carefully for aggression), tiger barbs, and a few others.

As for cleaner fish, can do cory cats and otos. If you prefer a pleco, there are a few plecos that would work that don't get any bigger than about 6 inches. So there are a few different things out there you could look at in your decision making.
__________________
55G Filstar XP3 - 16" Fire Eel
75G Medium Planted - Filstar XP3 Low Light - Established Feb 2006
Lonewolfblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 06:23 AM   #7
Aquarium Advice FINatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Utah USA
Posts: 865
Yet another "Death to the UGF!" thread. UGF's are not necessarily bad. I have a ugf and a hob on my 20 gal. Everyone says they are nitrate factories but my nitrates are around 5 ppm, and I am downright neglectful of tank maintainance. Part of this is my live plants, but I have been adding nitrate fertilizer as well.

UGF's are not strong mechanical filters-they don't move enough water. UGF's are great biological filters-they use your substrate as biological media, and they are a good passive mechanical filter. My brother removed his ugf and he noticed a lot more stuff floating around in the tank and sitting on top of the gravel.

There are several excellent non-teardown ways to clean your ugf. I stick a siphon hose down the uptube and suck out ridiculous amounts of junk. If you have a ugf with a flat surface, clear a space of gravel and place your gravel vac flush with the plate and move it around on the surface.

UGF's are not great for planted tanks, especially for heavy root feeders. Their roots will grow under the plates and won't get the nutrients they need. In my tank, I have my root feeding plants in terra cotta pots with my brother's special potting blend.

My verdict-HOB with UGF is a good setup unless you don't like how it looks, don't want to run an air pump, you have root-feeding plants, or you have an incompatible substrate like sand. I would not use a UGF alone.

LONG LIVE THE UGF!
__________________
Long live the UGF!
Apocalypse_Gold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 11:24 AM   #8
Aquarium Advice Addict
 
TomK2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Glen Ellyn, IL
Posts: 2,085
Well, all filters are nitrate factories. That is their very purpose, to convert ammonia into nitrate, which is less toxic to fish. Thus, the amount of nitrate is determined by the ammount of ammonia you put in (bio- load) minus any removed by plants and PWC's. Gunk trapped in an UGF can conitue to break down into more nitrate and other organic compounds that is not easily removed by vacuuming, but I do not think it is significant with good tank maintenance. UGF's require uplift tubes, with an airstone or powerhead. They do accumulate gunk underneath them, and thorough cleaning of them means a tank tear down, but they take years to reach that point. And they also work. In my opinion, HOB or canisters work just as well, are easier to clean, maintain, and repair, so why bother with an UGF? But if you like them, I have no objections.
__________________
TomK2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 02:26 PM   #9
AA Team Emeritus
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Whitby, Ont,Canada
Posts: 2,755
Good points made by TomK2 and Apocalypse-Gold. I have one tank that has been running with a UGF for 12 years without tear down. A ugf with reverse flow powerhead, and HOB or cannister should be a very good solution in a non planted tank. The slight flow up through the gravel should help the other filters remove the detritus and reduce the amount of gravel vauuming necessary.
__________________
Join a fish club. Don't have one in your area? Start one.
BillD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 04:54 PM   #10
Aquarium Advice Activist
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 121
Thanks Tom2K, Apocalypse Gold and BillD for your info. I am a lot clearer now on the pro and cons of UFG and HOB.
That info is almost worth a sticky!
__________________

__________________
carpediem
carpediem is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
filter, hob, undergravel, undergravel filter

Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on AquariumAdvice.com

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Advice... HOB Skimmer and HOB Filter ferchoz Saltwater & Reef - Getting Started 5 07-15-2009 04:35 PM
LR versus filter media jc1of2 Saltwater Reef Aquaria 10 11-17-2005 09:14 PM
HOB filters vs. undergravel dieanna Freshwater & Brackish - General Discussion 7 09-12-2005 01:31 PM
can i use a undergravel filter with pool filter sand bob112233 Freshwater & Brackish - General Discussion 12 08-24-2005 10:40 AM
Undergravel versus Powered filter discussion LondonGman Freshwater & Brackish - General Discussion 5 09-19-2003 01:04 PM







» Photo Contest Winners








Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.