Optimal Filtration

The friendliest place on the web for anyone with an interest in aquariums or fish keeping!
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

Rak9378

Aquarium Advice Activist
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Messages
132
Location
Long Island, NY
I am running a Fluval 406 canister filter on my 54 gallon tank. The tank is fully stocked and heavily planted. So far the 406 seems to be doing a great job. That said while my water is clear I would not say it is crystal clear. I think this is due mainly to the fact that I can see small particles in the water. So that brings me to my question...I would like to get opinions on what is the best media for catching small particles? I'm also curious if I'm utilizing my media baskets in the best way possible. For anyone not familiar with the 406 here is a schematic from Fluval's website....I added the numbers for ease of reference...

I am running a Fluval 406 canister filter on my 54 gallon tank. The tank is fully stocked and heavily planted. So far the 406 seems to be doing a great job. That said while my water is clear I would not say it is crystal clear. I think this is due mainly to the fact that I can see small particles in the water. So that brings me to my question...I would like to get opinions on what is the best media for catching small particles? I'm also curious if I'm utilizing my media baskets in the best way possible. For anyone not familiar with the 406 here is a schematic from Fluval's website....I added the numbers for ease of reference...

87197-albums13634-picture65031.jpg


The water flows through the filter in numerical order. Here is a quick run down of my media:

#1 - Foam sponges (came with filter)
#'s 2 & 3 - Fluval Bio-Foam (both mechanical and biological foam. came with filter)
#'s 4 & 5 - Fluval Bio-Max (biological filter media)
#'s 6 & 7 - Fluval Bio-Max (biological filter media)
#'s 8 & 9 - Coralife 100 micron mechanical filter pads and Chemi-pure carbon

I should mention that I recently added the 100 micron filter pad (I added it to the polishing pad that came with filter) and I have seen an improvement but it's still not perfect. So any suggestions to fix my floating particle problem or how to improve my filtration in general?

Thanks!
 
I personally am obsessed with getting my water crystal clear and polished so I though I'd chime in here even though I don't own a canister.

I assume you want water that looks like this:

Crystal Clear Water in Aquarium Tanks - YouTube

or

How to get crystal clear aquarium water - YouTube

After my "pursuit for perfection," using HOB's, I found it could only be achieved (at least close) after making sure ALL water in the tank passes through 100 micron polishing pad (as well as Seachem Purigen for chemical filtration):

Aquarium Advice - Aquarium Forum Community - Paul1792's Album: Paul1792's 38 gallon - Picture

After downloading the owners manual to your filter, it looks very capable of excellent filtration. I believe that your problem is caused by either or both of the following issues:

1) water is bypassing the 100 micron polishing pads in the filter

and/or

2) the fact that your tank is "heavily planted" is restricting the flow of debris laden water to the intake on your (relatively) large tank (I think this is the problem).

If you are sure it's not #1, you could always try this:

Aquarium Filters & Filtration: Fluval Multi-Stage Series Water Polishing Pads

which gets you down to 60 microns but is labeled "not for continuous use."

or putting on a pre-filter - "filter sock" on your intake

Particulates in the the tank - Page 2

However, If you are certain there is no bypass in your filter, I'd suggest adding an HOB with the intake at the opposite end from the intake on your canister and making sure all water passes through 100 micron polishing pads. Specifically, I'd recommend a Fluval C4. Although a C3 would do it, the C3 intake only goes half way to the bottom of the tank so you have to buy a $7 extension. If you're going to do that, however, you might as well upgrade to C4 and run it at lower volume for a few bucks more. Note .... before giving myself a nice filter laden Christmas present .... I used a cheap walmart aqua-tech stuffed with custom media including 100 micron filter pads ..... and even got crystal clear water with that.

[Note: I just had a bad experience with aqua clear 50 running side by side with C3 ..... the factory media did not cut it. My C4 on my 29 gallon keeps water perfect ... so I got a second C3 to run on my 38 gallon. I use aquatic life 100 micron non-woven polishing pads in my HOB's.]
 
Paul, thx for the detailed response. That is some clear water you have! :lol:

I think my problem is the 100 micron polishing pad just isn't catching everything. It has definitely improved water clarity but it's still not perfect. I may look into the 60 micron pads you suggested even if it just on a temporary basis to clear up after gravel vacuuming etc.

I really don't think its due to the tank being planted. I find a lot of "stuff" if my filter sponges so I'm pretty sure water flow is good. As for the tank being relatively large, the 406 is rated for up to 100g so nearly double the size of my tank. I also considered adding a HOB but I just don't want another filter to manage and more equipment on the tank. I think the 406 should be enough.

I am curious about your experience with Purigen. I have been toying with the notion of using it instead of the Chemi-pure. But the guy at my LFS convinced me to stick with Chemi-pure (they carry both products so I believe he was being genuine). Any issues you are aware of with using Purigen in a planted tank?

I will also give filter socks a look. Hadn't considered that! :)

Thx
 
Apologize to all for the repetitive first paragraph. That's what happens you post things at 2am!! :lol:
 
Paul, thx for the detailed response. That is some clear water you have! :lol:

I think my problem is the 100 micron polishing pad just isn't catching everything. It has definitely improved water clarity but it's still not perfect. I may look into the 60 micron pads you suggested even if it just on a temporary basis to clear up after gravel vacuuming etc.

I really don't think its due to the tank being planted. I find a lot of "stuff" if my filter sponges so I'm pretty sure water flow is good. As for the tank being relatively large, the 406 is rated for up to 100g so nearly double the size of my tank. I also considered adding a HOB but I just don't want another filter to manage and more equipment on the tank. I think the 406 should be enough.

I am curious about your experience with Purigen. I have been toying with the notion of using it instead of the Chemi-pure. But the guy at my LFS convinced me to stick with Chemi-pure (they carry both products so I believe he was being genuine). Any issues you are aware of with using Purigen in a planted tank?

I will also give filter socks a look. Hadn't considered that! :)

Thx
*************
I agree you have plenty of filtration capacity and at 383 GPH

Fluval 406 External Canister Filter Review | Tropical Fish Site

your ratio of GPH to Tank size is almost 7, which is excellent for a canister set up. However, just because you are catching lots of debris, doesn't mean there aren't "dead spots" in your aquarium ....... or that the current generated by the 383 GPH flow is sufficient to draw detritus from all ends of the tank.

Since you see visible particles in the water, let me suggest this as an alternative. Put in either an air stone or some cute bubbling devise to stir up current at the opposite end of the tank from the filter intake. This would stir it up enough to get it into the regular "inflow" current of the filter intake. Or, if the filter intake is at one end ....... not sure if this would work ....... but try moving the intake to the center of the tank .... if you can ... or if you can, put the intake at one end and the outflow at the other. (I don't know if that's possible).

My aqua-tech 30-60 HOB had a 330 GPH flow and was drawing from a tank 36 inches long ..... but seemed to catch all debris that I wasn't siphoning out during regular water changes. Your tank is probably 48 inches or so long and the distance might be too far for a 383 GPH intake ...... again ..... just a thought to get optimal circulation from throughout the tank to the filter intake.

As for Purigen, I'd ignore your LFS guy. He probably believes he is correct .... but based on the bazillions of reviews and discussion of this product, Purigen wins hands down.

If you started a new thread called Purigen vs Chemi-Pure, I can tell you Purigen would be the hands down winner. It works GREAT for me for keeping parameters in check. I bought it based on all the rave review for it on this forum and purchases reviews on Amazon.

Also, Amazon sells the 100 ml size for $8, which is about 60% of what local LFS charge. It lasts 4-6 months and can be regenerated (although, I plan to just trash it when it is fully used up)

Amazon.com: Seachem Purigen 100ml: Pet Supplies

[note the 5 star rating. Also, I had never even heard of Chemi-Pure until you mentioned it this morning ....... and then I was at PetLand early this afternoon and their employee .... who has a salt water tank mentioned it out of the blue as great stuff for salt water tanks when I was there to buy another fish for my 29 gallon and mentioned I use Purigen. So it must have a decent following]

Best wishes and good luck.
 
Paul, Thx again for the detailed responses. I appreciate the feedback.

*************
However, just because you are catching lots of debris, doesn't mean there aren't "dead spots" in your aquarium ....... or that the current generated by the 383 GPH flow is sufficient to draw detritus from all ends of the tank.

That's interesting, I hadn't really considered dead spots. After thinking about it some more this could be a problem given that my intake is behind a rock wall...there is plenty of room so that its not blocked but perhaps it is preventing the particles from entering the filter.

*************
try moving the intake to the center of the tank .... if you can ... or if you can, put the intake at one end and the outflow at the other. (I don't know if that's possible).

My aqua-tech 30-60 HOB had a 330 GPH flow and was drawing from a tank 36 inches long ..... but seemed to catch all debris that I wasn't siphoning out during regular water changes. Your tank is probably 48 inches or so long and the distance might be too far for a 383 GPH intake ...... again ..... just a thought to get optimal circulation from throughout the tank to the filter intake.

My tank is a bow front so I don't really have a center :lol: Here is a link to a thread with some pics so you can see my set-up..

http://www.aquariumadvice.com/forums/f24/aquascape-advice-290206.html

So after reading your post I noticed that while I have my intake and outflow are as opposite as they can be for a corner tank, the outflow is pointed towards the same side of the tank as the intake. So I have adjusted the outflow so that it is pointing to the center of the tank. Let's see if that makes a difference.

I'm also going to try a finer polishing pad and I will definitely give Purigen a shot. If all else fails I will look into getting a HOB. So you recommend Fluval over AquaClear (I think they are made by the same company)? :thanks:
 
Paul, Thx again for the detailed responses. I appreciate the feedback.



That's interesting, I hadn't really considered dead spots. After thinking about it some more this could be a problem given that my intake is behind a rock wall...there is plenty of room so that its not blocked but perhaps it is preventing the particles from entering the filter.



My tank is a bow front so I don't really have a center :lol: Here is a link to a thread with some pics so you can see my set-up..

http://www.aquariumadvice.com/forums/f24/aquascape-advice-290206.html

So after reading your post I noticed that while I have my intake and outflow are as opposite as they can be for a corner tank, the outflow is pointed towards the same side of the tank as the intake. So I have adjusted the outflow so that it is pointing to the center of the tank. Let's see if that makes a difference.

I'm also going to try a finer polishing pad and I will definitely give Purigen a shot. If all else fails I will look into getting a HOB. So you recommend Fluval over AquaClear (I think they are made by the same company)? :thanks:
*****************************

They are both owned by Hagen, yes. But the Fluval C series makes the AquaClear obsolete. Go here:

http://www.aquariumadvice.com/forums/f60/what-is-the-best-hob-filter-138948-2.html

and read my posts #11 & #13.

The AquaClear has been around for almost 20 years ? ....... When introduced it was a state of the art HOB .... that's why so many people swear by them. But the Fluval C series with polishing pad & trickle chamber (that the aquaclear does not have) gives Canister filter quality water right out of the box. Just ditch the carbon, stick in the Purigen, and I have my "custom media" listed in that thread. Note the link to the bypass issue on AquaClear. I had to duct tape mine to get it to work. Replaced it with a second Fluval C. I have spent about as much money on filters than if I just would have gotten a canister in the first place !!!!!!!! [Two Fluval C3's + an aquaclear 50].

Note: The AquaClear moves water bottom to top of the filter at such high velocity it will not take a 100 micron polishing pad (so most people use floss) .... The Fluval moves water back to front so more than double the surface area means lower velocity water as well as a great design make it so it can handle a 100 micron polishing pad that cannot be bypassed.

Also, the fact they are made by the same company is irrelevant. A Chevy Cruze is made by the same company as Cadillac CTS. That doesn't mean they have the same specs. Luckily, the "Cadillac" Fluval C is only about $5 more than a comparable AquaClear.

Note also: If you're going to buy a Fluval, might as well spring for a C4 because by the time you add the extension tube for the C3 at $7, it's only a few bucks more to upgrade to C4. To avoid excess current, you can run them as low as one third the flow but the Hagen patented re-filtering technology let's you slow the flow while keeping up the same GPH of filtration.

That's what I do on my 29 gallon. I have a C4 (mfg says for tanks up to 70 gallons) and run it at half of capacity to avoid serious "rip-current" effect.
 
Holy Aquascape !!!!! WOW

My tank is a bow front so I don't really have a center :lol: Here is a link to a thread with some pics so you can see my set-up..

http://www.aquariumadvice.com/forums/f24/aquascape-advice-290206.html

So after reading your post I noticed that while I have my intake and outflow are as opposite as they can be for a corner tank, the outflow is pointed towards the same side of the tank as the intake. So I have adjusted the outflow so that it is pointing to the center of the tank. Let's see if that makes a difference.

Here is an updated pic of my tank. I would like to add more plants but I think I'm reaching a point where I need to provide some extra fertilization. I am currently dosing Flourish 1-2x per week and I used Flourite under my substrate. My lighting consists of a T5 HO with two 10k daylight bulbs and I run it for 8 hours a day on a timer. I am thinking of starting a dosing schedule with Excel and adding dry macro ferts using the EI method. I'm also considering cutting back the amount of time the lights are on. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. I'm sure there is a bunch of information I'm not providing so feel free to ask any questions. :thanks:


WOW.............. I followed your link.

Your aquascape is phenomenal (y). Nice job. Your fish pics in your album are sweet, too !!!!!

I am hopeful that redirecting the water flow solves your problem without having to add a filter.
 
Thx For the info and the very nice compliments!! Aquascaping has surprisingly been a lot of fun for me. I started off with busying some wood and rocks for the fish and it has turned into a creative outlet for me. :)

I will let you know if redirecting the outflow makes a difference. I will definitely give the Fluval C4 a look if I don't get that crystal clear water I want!!
 
I agree with Paul, excellent advice. I can't really add much to that but another option is adding a relatively cheap but decent HOB and just fill it with filter floss. I do this and just swap out the floss each week. Keeps the water crystal clear.
The Purigen, I am a big fan and I also plan a Fluval C series filter for my 15g soon, (I'll be giving you a shout when I get it Paul!!).
 
Last edited:
I have a Fluval 406 & a c4 that I run on a 75 gal with lots of rock structures. I originally just had the 406 and recently added the c4 due to flow/circulation issues with the large rocks. Personally I found this to be a great addition.
 
I have a Fluval 406 & a c4 that I run on a 75 gal with lots of rock structures. I originally just had the 406 and recently added the c4 due to flow/circulation issues with the large rocks. Personally I found this to be a great addition.


Thanks! That's a helpful perspective! What media do you keep in the 406?
 
At the time I'm using biomax. I have two trays of it (4 compartments). I've been thinking of replacing a tray with the plastic mesh pot scrubbies but haven't yet. The c4 has it's own small bio media and a pretty cool small trickle chamber.
 
Thx Mike.

So redirecting the outflow seems to have helped a bit. But there are still some particles visible. I noticed that it seems to be concentrated in the top half of the tank so I'm thinking my rock wall is in fact messing with the flow. I ordered the Fluval Polishing pads and Purigen...they will be here Sunday...so I will see if that makes a difference. If not it looks like I will be adding a C4.

How wide would you guys say it is?
 
Thx Mike.

So redirecting the outflow seems to have helped a bit. But there are still some particles visible. I noticed that it seems to be concentrated in the top half of the tank so I'm thinking my rock wall is in fact messing with the flow. I ordered the Fluval Polishing pads and Purigen...they will be here Sunday...so I will see if that makes a difference. If not it looks like I will be adding a C4.

How wide would you guys say it is?

the purigen bag is around 3X5 or so. I run a sponge, purigen and biomax in an AC HOB and the water is crystal clear. Be advised it takes a couple of days to getthat fish in air look.
 
the purigen bag is around 3X5 or so. I run a sponge, purigen and biomax in an AC HOB and the water is crystal clear. Be advised it takes a couple of days to getthat fish in air look.

Thx Mr Fisher but I was actually asking about the width of the c4. Which I believe is a little over 8"
 
Aesthetics & "fit" of C3 and C4.

Just measured. 9 3/8" wide, 5" deep, which 3 1/2" is off the back of the tank.
You may want to re-measure, Mike !!!!!
******************
First, here is a picture of the C3 and a C4 running side by side. I took this when I ran both of them next to each other on my 29 gallon tank before moving the C3 to my 38 gallon tank.

http://s948.photobucket.com/user/Paul1792/media/HOB%20Filtration/C3ampC4sidebyside1_zps61ececb8.jpg.html

The C4 measures 8 and 5/16" along the back of the tank.
The C3 runs just a tad over 7" along the back of the tank.

The top back of the C4 is 2 and 1/2" above the rim of the tank.
The top back of the C3 is just under 2" above the rim of the thank.

I have an Aqueon brand 38 gallon tank that sits on a stand against a wall in the living room. The rim is 3 & 3/4 from the wall. The glass is 3 & 7/8 inches from the wall. I tried to fit the C4 that is now on my 29 gallon on the 38 gallon but it would have made an ever so slight indentation in the wall if I tried to cram it in there so I ordered a second C3 rather than a C4.

In the end, I like having the twin C3's next to each other for "good looks." But really no big deal. Though the cost of the C3 and C4 were about equal due to the $7 extension tube needed on the C3, I just didn't want to tear down the tank to move it 1/4 inch.

The "factory" mechanical debris reducing and polishing pad are one unit. On the C3 it measures just under 5" x 5" or just under 25 square inches. On the C4, it measures just over 5 & 1/2" x 6 & 1/4 inches or just about 35 square inches.

I don't use the factory media. The factory polishing pad is more like 150 microns and just doesn't go "all the way" for "diamond studded" clarity of the water. Accordingly, I use cut to fit Acurel Debris reducing pad + AquaticLife 100 Micron Non-Woven Filter (polishing) pad for "canister style" results. The depth of the two pads fits perfectly into the slot of the one "factory" poly/fiber pad.

Many people say you can just use floss in an aqua clear and get crystal water with that "fish swimming in air" look. That is actually correct .... but there is clearly a step above that. When I had only the C3 & AquaClear 50 with floss running next to each other, the water lost its "edge" in a few days from when I removed the Aqua-Tech 30-60. As a result, I had to run the Aqua-Tech (temporarily on the front of the tank) ...... so the water was flowing about 600 gph of flow in my tanks just to feed my obsession with having "conversation piece" sparkling clear aquarium water. Two C3's in tandem handle it well..... The AC/50 is running on 1/3 flow just for BB & backup.
 
Back
Top Bottom