Go Back   Aquarium Advice - Aquarium Forum Community > General Aquarium Forums > General Hardware/Equipment Discussion

Join Aquarium Advice Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on AquariumAdvice.com
Old 02-23-2012, 02:21 PM   #11
Aquarium Advice Addict
carey's Avatar

POTM Champion
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Deltona, Florida
Posts: 20,962
I am looking at a bubble magus as well from ebay, thanks to mr x.

Good deal then.

180g Reef - 60g Rimless Reef -90G FOWLR- 125g Malawi Cichlids- 40b REEF- 34g Fresh Planted-working on- 20L FOWLR- working on
I have a mix of many different saltwater fish amongst my tanks, but I love my Tangs most of all.
carey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2012, 02:30 PM   #12
Aquarium Advice FINatic
caitlynnanne9189's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 793
Originally Posted by carey
I am looking at a bubble magus as well from ebay, thanks to mr x.

Good deal then.
Yep! That's the same thing im doing because of mr x!

caitlynnanne9189 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2012, 01:47 PM   #13
Aquarium Advice Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 50
From my research everywhere it appears that the 75gpd units are the norm and produce the most amount of water the quickest with the least amount of waste water. (/quote]

Any residential scale membrane (up to 150 gpd) should be run with the same waste water to purified water ratio: 4 to 1.

The plus unit has a gauge on it for water pressure too, I was going to see if I have the 65psi needed to add a booster membrane that would up the gpd to 150 and result in a 1:1 ratio as far as pure water and wast water.
First - remember that what folks call "waste water" really would be better thought of as "flush water" in that this water serves the important purpose of internally flushing the surface of the semipermeable membrane to keep the membrane from fouling/scaling.

When you configure a system with two membranes in series (the waste from the first membrane going to the "in" port on the second membrane), for this discussion let's say it's two 75 gpd membranes, the system behaves like you have a single long (75 gpd x 2) 150 gpd membrane.

Now - if you use a proper flow restrictor, that is, one for a 150 gpd membrane, you'll have about a 4:1 waste to product ratio. Sounds familiar, right?

If however you don't change the flow restrictor - meaning you keep using the same restrictor you were using when you just had one 75 gpd membrane, then you'll see a waste to product ratio much lower than 4:1. But remember that the recommendation for a ~4:1 ratio comes from the membrane manufacturer. They are telling you that you need about a 4:1 ratio to keep the membrane flushed and keep the membrane from fouling or building up scale. Run the system with a lower ratio and you will foul/scale the membrane(s) quicker than would have otherwise been the case.

Instead of adding a second membrane to lower that ratio, you could have just changed out your flow restrictor ($4) instead. A much less expensive approach to get you to the same endpoint in terms of saving on waste water.

Now, to confuse things just a bit. Filmtec specs call for the 4 to 1 ratio on the basis of assumptions about the water that will be supplied to the membrane. If you have very soft water you MAY be able to get a decent service life from the membrane running at a ratio lower than 4 to 1 (e.g., 3 to 1). Remember that the waste water from the first membrane is about 25% harder than your tap water.

Bottom line: If what you are after is reduced waste water, experiment with a different flow restrictor for $4 instead of messing around with a second membrane plumbed in series.

As a side note, you can also lower the ratio by increasing the pressure delivered to the membrane (with a booster pump), because flow restrictors are sized assuming you are providing factory spec conditions (50 psi and 77 degrees for Filmtec membranes). Increase the pressure and you'll drive more water through the membrane and viola - less waste water. But as I mentioned above, if you do this (just like over-restricting a membrane) - the lower the waste to product ratio, the shorter the lifespan on the membrane.

Makes sense?


Buckeye is offline   Reply With Quote

rodi, unit

Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on AquariumAdvice.com

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ro unit joy13 General Hardware/Equipment Discussion 0 02-21-2012 10:13 AM
Rodi Reeffanman Saltwater Reef Aquaria 1 02-19-2012 09:04 PM
Wanted: Ro unit Reefpete Archive 0 02-16-2012 06:57 PM
Recommendations for new RO unit Keith A. General Hardware/Equipment Discussion 6 01-28-2012 02:30 PM
Co2 unit Bizbaz Freshwater & Brackish - Planted Tanks 12 01-28-2012 04:55 AM

» Photo Contest Winners

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities

Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.