Plant Lighting Suggestion

The friendliest place on the web for anyone with an interest in aquariums or fish keeping!
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
You should research that center brace thing. I've seen some people just remove that. It might just be there to help hold those stock hoods with led lights, which you don't plan on using anyway.

Dr. Fosters sells those glass hoods that you would replace those black plastic hoods with. You can just place that marineland LED 48" right across the top on the glass... Possibly with or without that center brace still attached.

Edit: here's that glass hood.
http://www.drsfostersmith.com/product/prod_display.cfm?pcatid=3781&rel=1
 
I actually thought about removing it but the frame itself has a sticker on that says if this brace is damaged do not fill with water.
 
You should research that center brace thing. I've seen some people just remove that. It might just be there to help hold those stock hoods with led lights, which you don't plan on using anyway.

Dr. Fosters sells those glass hoods that you would replace those black plastic hoods with. You can just place that marineland LED 48" right across the top on the glass... Possibly with or without that center brace still attached.

Edit: here's that glass hood.
http://www.drsfostersmith.com/product/prod_display.cfm?pcatid=3781&rel=1

No no Brian! Definitely need the brace!
 
You can use a 48" fixture, the brace won't effect it because of the fixtures legs will just sit on either end raising the fixture up a few inches.

That would be my suggestion too. You will have a little but of shadow from the brace but nothing major. Then you can get glass tops or leave it topless (which is how I keep mine because I'm paranoid it reduces my light haha).
 
Haha... I wasn't sure about that brace! It was 1 of 2 things for me: (1) it actually 'braces' the aquarium or (2) it was there to just hold those two plastic hoods. LOL... yeah, if the sticker says that, don't remove it! LOL

But yeah, you can just lay a 48" fixture right across the length of the aquarium. There would be only a minimal amount of light blockage from the center brace. I'd go with the glass top, but that's just me.
 
Honestly, I would highly recommend the Finnex Ray 2 LED fixture that Brian suggested over the Marineland one. There isn't one person that I've seen who has a nice tank with the Marineland light but lots and lots of people use the Finnex lights with great results. The Marineland LEDs use optics to get higher PAR ratings but they can give the tank a weird multi-spotlight type of look. The Finnex fixtures spread out the light way more evenly and are proven to grow plants.

If cost is an issue (like most of us here) you can buy the co2 rig a little bit later and just use glute from Amazon for a while. It'll run you less than $30 and it'll last you a very long time (over a year). That will really help to divide the initial cost and you could still have a beautiful tank in the mean time. Of course, having a real co2 system is wonderful. I love mine, but it isn't a crime to wait to get one if you want to take it easy on the wife. She may appreciate your thoughtfulness. :)
 
Haha.. Well said. But just expect medium light on a tank this size from a single ray 2. There's no mistaking it, however, the Ray 2 grows plants -- even at distances of 18" from light to substrate. It's doing just that on my 26g. However, i am considering adding another fixture along side the Ray2 because the plants that are suppose to show reds, yellows, and oranges aren't really doing that... Just a nice green (which still isn't bad) - with the exception if the ludwigia sp. red and A. reinekii that are still red. Even my DHG is carpeting at that distance.

Anyway, slightly off topic but... Was it you Brian or Bill that bought the nice pair of shoes for "the wife" to get approval on a new tank? Haha.. This method may work in this case too! ;)
 
The Finnex Ray 2 48" Is actually cheaper on amazon than the marineland led I was going to buy, by over $150. So everyone is in agreement this is the one that will get the job done? I might have to skip the shoe if that's the case.
 
4Ft/4Bulbs fixture - I have one for my 25g Planted tank and its a great little light, Get bulbs for color temp 6500k (Its one of the options) Its a great fixture and cheap. It will go everything well. You really need 4 bulbs if you want a quality planted tank. Also if you want to grow a plant that will carpet your tank like angel tears you will need a 4bulb fixture. Dont go with any of the crappy LEDS for a planted tank. The t5ho is the light for a planted tank or you could go with LED but they will cost you a LOT because you need quailty ones.

See the problem with lighting for planted tanks is this. Almost any light will grow plants as long as it has some form of power. Using a light thats extreamly strong will give you more dense plants instead of long stemy plants. It will reduce how often you have to prune and will make your tank much more lush. Many people go with lower lights and then the tank isnt dense. Heres some pictures of my 75g when it was a planted tank. I have to say I miss the hell out of it even though its a reef now.

Keep in mind however I did dose co2

img_2335348_0_8489e843fd8d98c2aca491c11c1a8df0.jpg


Right side of the tank
img_2335348_1_a8c11ad4bf1809e2a1427180264c18b8.jpg


Center Of tank
img_2335348_2_2be8a0c9be9024f08831f5ada81fe8d5.jpg


Right side of tank
img_2335348_3_5ed5285f300234085380d38649265383.jpg


At the begining
img_2335348_4_98de55e69ae0c3ed3f448cf1a5d76223.jpg

img_2335348_5_43ba49b918be9515fb8271af37eae874.jpg
 
Spending money on a quality led fixture or two that will last 50,000 hours (nearly 18 years on a standard 8 hour cycle) makes more sense than spending money on bulbs every 6-12 months. ;)
 
+1 I agree with you BillBug... I really think the upfront cost is well worth it. The LED's practically pay for themselves overtime!

I would have agreed with CleverB's argument years ago. But with anything "technology" it's always more expensive at first but gradually gets more affordable over time. The same goes with LED's... yes they have a ways to go, but IMO the Finnex line of LED's have broken that barrier of affordable but effective 'quality' LED's. They are still fairly new so we'll see how longevity goes... hopefully enough to get the return on investment.

Anyway... my 26g is pretty tall at 21". From light to substrate is about 18".

I have been using the Finnex Ray 2 24" double daylight fixture on my 26g and I'm getting "medium" lighting due to distance from light to substrate.

Here's how mine looks...
8301337018_21dccb4489_c.jpg


Here's how the Finnex Ray 2 performed on my tank after 8 weeks of growth (granted I use pressurized co2, use Flourish root tabs in Floramax substrate, dose PPS-Pro dry ferts from GLA, AND did a little trimming):
ibcvMYcPovYkV9.jpg


Overall, I'm happy with the growth I'm getting, knowing that I'm only getting "medium" lighting at the distance. If I want "high" light (which I'm currently teasing myself with :facepalm:), I'll just add on another fixture to do the numbers game with PAR values. Yes, high lighting helps with compact growth and gets some plants to color up in reds or whatnot. That's just a decision you'll have to make... medium lighting vs. high lighting?

And best of all, currently my LED fixture is only using 20 watts total with very little heat generated. :)
 
Wmc2009 said:
The Finnex Ray 2 48" Is actually cheaper on amazon than the marineland led I was going to buy, by over $150. So everyone is in agreement this is the one that will get the job done? I might have to skip the shoe if that's the case.

That's another great point. You could almost buy two of the Ray 2s for the price of one Marineland fixture! If you ever did decide to get a second one, you wouldn't have spent any more money than the one Marineland costs, and the amount of light you would have would pretty much be overkill.

Brian_Nano12g said:
Anyway, slightly off topic but... Was it you Brian or Bill that bought the nice pair of shoes for "the wife" to get approval on a new tank? Haha.. This method may work in this case too! ;)

That was Bill but I think we all learned from that bit of wisdom! rofl

Billbug68 said:
Spending money on a quality led fixture or two that will last 50,000 hours (nearly 18 years on a standard 8 hour cycle) makes more sense than spending money on bulbs every 6-12 months. ;)

Totally right. T5s are nice, and they definitely work, but it really feels like you're just renting the lights once you start replacing all those lamps. LEDs are also cooler running and cheaper to power. They're even better for the environment because LEDs don't use the hazardous chemicals that fluorescents have inside the tubes.
 
Haha.. Well said. But just expect medium light on a tank this size from a single ray 2. There's no mistaking it, however, the Ray 2 grows plants -- even at distances of 18" from light to substrate. It's doing just that on my 26g. However, i am considering adding another fixture along side the Ray2 because the plants that are suppose to show reds, yellows, and oranges aren't really doing that... Just a nice green (which still isn't bad) - with the exception if the ludwigia sp. red and A. reinekii that are still red. Even my DHG is carpeting at that distance.

Anyway, slightly off topic but... Was it you Brian or Bill that bought the nice pair of shoes for "the wife" to get approval on a new tank? Haha.. This method may work in this case too! ;)

Do your RED plants get enough Iron ??
I know high light plus correct ferts bring out the most color, but I'm not running high tech so fuzzy on the details ;)
 
@Corsair - Well I dose PPS-Pro and my Plantex CSM+B micro mix (I believe) has about 7% chelated iron. I also have Flourish Tabs embedded throughout the tank that has iron as well (not sure how much though). I strategically placed those where I planted the flora that are suppose to color up. I have a similar setup with my 6g rimless which is significantly shorter, also under a Finnex Ray 2, but only 12" from light to sub. Conversely, I get really nice colors from the plants in there due to increased PAR -- putting that tank in the "high" light range.

I'm not sure if I'm missing something, but I suspect it's the PAR vs. Distance that's affecting the values to be the culprit. Hence, my contemplation on adding more light ONLY because I foolishly labeled that tank thread "Dutch" inspired. What good is it Dutch when I can't get more splashes of color? I kinda set myself up for disaster on that... :facepalm: LOL
 
Well i have to say this LED finnex came out after i left the planted tank hobby. If there is a good LED out there go for it!!! they will save you loads of money in the long run. The when i was still in it the led people were trying to use in the marine land and it is junk for planted tanks
 
@Brian You may want to try adding an iron nail right under your red plants. I was having the same issue with red coloring from my RTL but after I added some iron chips to the substrate around it, it colored right up. Iron nails are more often recommended on TPT forums and they actually can help. Of course iron root tabs are always the more common option.
 
Okay I'll have to give one of those options a shot before i keep blaming the light then. Where do i get them?

Edit: I don't want to hijack this thread any longer... I'm going to pose the same question about the red plants, iron, and light intensity on my 26g thread. Sorry OP for hijacking!!!

I think the overall consensus to address the OP's original question is the recommended Finnex Ray 2 :)
 
Back
Top Bottom