Go Back   Aquarium Advice - Aquarium Forum Community > Saltwater and Reef > Nano Reefs
Click Here to Login

Join Aquarium Advice Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on AquariumAdvice.com
 
Old 08-02-2011, 05:15 PM   #1
Aquarium Advice Activist
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 101
Are nano reefs easiers to keep than bigger saltwater aquaria ?

Are these any easiers to keep and if not which is the easiest type of saltwater aquaria ?

__________________
jonesy99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2011, 05:19 PM   #2
Aquarium Advice Freak
 
Mjpendrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ruthin but From Worcester
Posts: 313
Nope most people will tell you they are harder because water volume is smaller leading to mistakes getting out of control quicker. They say start bigger.
__________________
eVeRyTiMe I lEaRn SoMeThInG nEw It PuShEs OlD sTuFf OuT oF mY bRaIn!
Mjpendrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2011, 05:33 PM   #3
SW REEF 20+ YEARS
Community Admin
 
melosu58's Avatar



Tank of the Month Award
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 39,145
As mentioned above the answer is No. More water volume is more forgiving when it comes to mistakes and water issues. I always suggest someone go with a bigger tank like a 55 gallon first and then for a challenge go with the nano tank. Just my experience.
__________________

SITE ADMINISTRATOR

You can view many of my fish and corals in my photo albums in my profile.

View my tank


AA Community Rules|AA TOS

Forums 101 - posting, accounts, basics
melosu58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 09:43 AM   #4
Aquarium Advice Addict
 
carey's Avatar

POTM Champion
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Deltona, Florida
Posts: 20,966
+1 Melosu58

Smaller tanks are more of a challenge to keep due to the limited water volume. When parameters go south, they go quickly.

I have a 4g all the way up to a 125g and I find I spend more time on my 4g pico than I do on the 125g!

55g is a great startup size in my opinion, if you must go smaller I found that my first sw tank, a 29g was a good place to start as well. If you are tight on space that is. The 29g is 30" long while a 55g is 48" long.

Hope that helped.
__________________
180g- Mostly BIG fish and some coral. ~80g Nuvo- My coral tank with "happy fish"~ 90g- FOWLR Not the not happy type of fish~ 125g- Freshwater Malawi Cichlids ~10g- Nuvo- The refugees from the Ich of '18
carey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 09:52 AM   #5
Aquarium Advice Freak
 
scubasteve03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: magnolia tx
Posts: 383
Agree with the above in this case bigger is easyer lol
__________________
scubasteve03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 10:34 AM   #6
member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,667
However, a smaller tank is easier to afford to do it properly. Bigger is better, but you have to stay small enough to do it properly. I have seen it many times where people get a cheap tank on craigslist but then can't afford to get enough rock, adequate lighting, a big enough skimmer, etc. and then can't figure out why the tank isn't thriving.
__________________
Fishguy2727 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
nano, nano reef, reef, salt, saltwater

Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them on AquariumAdvice.com

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
combining 2 nano reefs into a 46g bowfront clearerphish Saltwater & Reef - Getting Started 7 10-05-2011 11:23 PM







» Photo Contest Winners







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.