 |
04-18-2004, 01:24 AM
|
#1
|
Aquarium Advice Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Weyers Cave, Virginia
Posts: 64
|
Reefrunner
I just looked through your picture gallery....great pics man. I was thinking its time for you to upgrade you camera and send me your old one
__________________
|
|
|
04-18-2004, 07:13 AM
|
#2
|
AA Team Emeritus
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cedar Key, FL
Posts: 1,663
|
LOL, I did just upgrade my camera, received the new one this past tuesday, and wed, I sold my old one and shipped it north
|
|
|
04-18-2004, 08:17 AM
|
#3
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland, Oh. USA
Posts: 2,158
|
i know. and if i didn't have to work that day and I could have gotten to my email in time it would be mine, but no use crying over spilled milk.
|
|
|
04-18-2004, 09:21 AM
|
#4
|
Aquarium Advice FINatic
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 869
|
How do you like that new cam? I'm becoming more fond of my Fuji S5000 the more I use it.
__________________
Brad C.
|
|
|
04-18-2004, 11:54 AM
|
#5
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 1,091
|
what is the new cam reefrunner?
__________________
A 46 gal bow front (Soft coral) reef tank with a 10 gal sump. And a 30 gal ( SPS and Clam) reef tank hooked up to the sump of the 46 so they share water.
|
|
|
04-18-2004, 05:05 PM
|
#6
|
AA Team Emeritus
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cedar Key, FL
Posts: 1,663
|
It's a fuji s7000, I like it, and it was an upgrade from the 995, but it is disappointing in some areas. It could have been so much better, but it is better than what I had, and it was cheaper than the 995 when I bought it, and it has a much better color rendition, so I'm pretty happy with it. I shot in RAW with it the other night, and let me just say, it is totally awesone doing the processing outside the cam. White balance and everything is set after the pic is taken, pretty cool
jackdp, that might be the answer to the s5000 not having a manual white balance
I could have saturated this one a hair more.
I liked this one...
|
|
|
04-18-2004, 05:47 PM
|
#7
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 1,091
|
omg the first pic is good cool looking. it looks like a cg. i
__________________
A 46 gal bow front (Soft coral) reef tank with a 10 gal sump. And a 30 gal ( SPS and Clam) reef tank hooked up to the sump of the 46 so they share water.
|
|
|
04-18-2004, 05:58 PM
|
#8
|
Aquarium Advice Activist
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 135
|
*gasp*
spectacular pictures reefrunner.
__________________
|
|
|
04-18-2004, 07:14 PM
|
#9
|
Aquarium Advice Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Weyers Cave, Virginia
Posts: 64
|
OMG gimme that camera lol
__________________
Scott
|
|
|
04-18-2004, 11:11 PM
|
#10
|
Aquarium Advice FINatic
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 869
|
Pics look great, I haven't played with the RAW on my cam yet. I guess you use PS to do the processing and set the WB etc. The more pics I take with my new cam and the more I get used to it, the more I like it. Its like a friend of mine keeps telling me, no matter what camera I would have bought, I still wouldn't be totally satisifed with it lol.
__________________
Brad C.
|
|
|
04-18-2004, 11:32 PM
|
#11
|
AA Team Emeritus
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cedar Key, FL
Posts: 1,663
|
Nope there is give and take to each cam, you got to find what fits in to your experience level, your photographic ability, and your budget. PS will not read the RAW file, PhotoShop CS has a RAW converter with it, but even that has to be updated at adobe.com to read Fuji's .RAF extension. There are a few freeware RAW converters that are supposed to be decent, the one bundled with the fuji software sucks! Loof for S7DRAW or something like that. I'll find it tomorrow and post a link. RAW also provides a better image, and if you under expose the pic...you can bump up the exposure etc....
|
|
|
04-18-2004, 11:48 PM
|
#12
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland, Oh. USA
Posts: 2,158
|
whats PS and Raw?
|
|
|
04-19-2004, 08:28 AM
|
#13
|
AA Team Emeritus
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cedar Key, FL
Posts: 1,663
|
PS=PhotoShop
The first version of Photoshop to have a RAW converter is PhotoShop CS.
RAW is the mode the camera stores the picture in. RAW files are exactly what the ccd sees when you tank the picture, with no in camera manipulation, for white balance, softening or sharpening, no jpeg compression, no saturation or any of the things done to the picture in camera that are done to other files.
|
|
|
04-19-2004, 10:23 AM
|
#14
|
Aquarium Advice Activist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Quincy, MA
Posts: 198
|
Hey RR, how big is your tank, jugding by the picture, it has to be big one for you to be able to maintain the health of your corals/fishy, the pictures give the look of a really healthy tank, isn' it?
__________________
|
|
|
04-19-2004, 10:35 AM
|
#15
|
AA Team Emeritus
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cedar Key, FL
Posts: 1,663
|
Yes, the tank is healthy, have to frag the corals regularly, the fish are healthy etc...It's not a large tank, it's 20g
|
|
|
 |
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|

» Vendor Spotlight (Deals & More) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Photo Contest Winners |
|
» Saltwater Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Freshwater Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Other Discussions & Classifieds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|