 |
|
04-01-2012, 08:27 PM
|
#1
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: So Cal
Posts: 5,455
|
Tang for a 66 gallon?
Are their any tangs besides the kole tang that dont need a 6 foot tank??? I woul never put a tang in a tank that is too small, so i wont put one in the 66 gal unless it would be happy. Thanks!
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 08:40 PM
|
#2
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: So Cal
Posts: 5,455
|
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 08:48 PM
|
#3
|
Aquarium Advice Freak
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 221
|
Well the Bristletooth tangs all list a 70 gal as minimum. Even at that I think many will say that is pushing it depending on rockwork and swim room designed into the tank. I have decided for myself to keep one Bristletooth tang in my 72 bowfront and not 2 tangs for sure.
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 08:50 PM
|
#4
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: So Cal
Posts: 5,455
|
Okay thank you! We plan on having a pretty wide open rock scape, lots of swimming room! Maybe 1 tang... A kole?
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 08:55 PM
|
#5
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 3,473
|
If your set on a tang I would go with a bristle tooth. They seem to get a little smaller.
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 08:55 PM
|
#6
|
Aquarium Advice Freak
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nu-Nu the eel
Okay thank you! We plan on having a pretty wide open rock scape, lots of swimming room! Maybe 1 tang... A kole?
|
If you do that I would suggest not getting another grazer for sure. I have been reading alot this weekend on tangs and any other grazer like a dwarf angel will be competing for the niche. You will need to supplement from what I have read with sea weed, algae sheets or other herbivore quality food. I have read that spinach, and romain lettuce if steamed or frozen are ok on the veggie clip also but I have elected to go with marine based algae sheets on the clip. It is a more natural food souce for the tangs so I just feel it must be better. Just MHO.
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 08:56 PM
|
#7
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 3,473
|
Why not just get a 75?
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 08:56 PM
|
#8
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,348
|
A Kole or something similar is all I would consider for that. Pushing it a bit, but as long as the tank isn't overstocked, the tang is well fed, and seems happy and healthy, could work. Other than the coveted "I have a tang!" status, any particular reason you want one? If for algae control, consider a rabbitfish. Fun, amusing, interesting, and some will even eat valonia!
__________________
Someone stop me! Please! But... not just yet...
55 Gal Tropical FW
55 Gal Mixed Reef
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 09:01 PM
|
#9
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: So Cal
Posts: 5,455
|
Thanks for the input! And guys i am not set on a tang at all, lol. I would love to own one, but if he wont fit in the tank he wont fit, i am ok with that. I dont wanna put a fish in a tank that is too small  i cant get a 75 because this tank has everything! Its amazing, a great setup! I would suppliment his foot with some algea and seaweed  i would like one because i feel like they really bring a reef tank to life! They are very active and thats what i like about them
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 09:02 PM
|
#10
|
Aquarium Advice Freak
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 221
|
The Ctenochaetus sp. tangs are all bristletooth varieties. Take a look at liveaqaria.com under tangs and look for this and bristletooth labels. These are all the smaller tangs I am aware of. The other benefit of this variety of tang is they seem to be more hardy and less prone to ich.
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 09:03 PM
|
#11
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: So Cal
Posts: 5,455
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShooterRick
The Ctenochaetus sp. tangs are all bristletooth varieties. Take a look at liveaqaria.com under tangs and look for this and bristletooth labels. These are all the smaller tangs I am aware of.
|
Yup i do like bristlenose tangs! Only need 70 gallons so that is up my ally
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 09:13 PM
|
#12
|
Aquarium Advice Addict


Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 10,296
|
The fact that the dimensions of the tank are not listed on that page is irritating.
The fact that the lighting is listed at 6x39W T5 HO gives me a context clue.
These are 3 foot bulbs. Based on the photo of the tank's hood with the bulbs installed, I think it's fairly safe to say this is a 3 foot tank. A 3 foot tank is not suitable for a tang IMO.
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 09:19 PM
|
#13
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: So Cal
Posts: 5,455
|
That is true. It might be a little bit bigger then 3 feet wide though, i will figure out the length and get back to you on that  haha if its not 4 feet or close then i dont know how i would feel putting a tang in there.
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 09:31 PM
|
#14
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: So Cal
Posts: 5,455
|
Alright the tank is roughly 39 inches long! Tang or no tang?
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 09:32 PM
|
#15
|
Aquarium Advice Freak
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by severum mama
The fact that the dimensions of the tank are not listed on that page is irritating.
The fact that the lighting is listed at 6x39W T5 HO gives me a context clue.
These are 3 foot bulbs. Based on the photo of the tank's hood with the bulbs installed, I think it's fairly safe to say this is a 3 foot tank. A 3 foot tank is not suitable for a tang IMO.
|
I looked at the link and the first fine print line in the specs I believe said it was 38 inches wide. That said it is small for a tang and I would suggest if you must have one of the smaller varieties of tangs you are going to have to resist the temptation to have more than a few small fish with it. No other grazers for sure. As I said my 72 bowfront is 4 ft wide and I consider it pushing with one small tang of the bristletooth variety. I have 80 lbs of rock in the tank and it is high quality very porous light rock and the reef is built on pillars and arches above the sand with a very small footprint. There is about 4 inches behind the reef and more of course in front of it and even then I feel it is still a stretch for the tang.
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 09:36 PM
|
#16
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: So Cal
Posts: 5,455
|
Alright thanks! Well i dont plan on having any other grazers, and my tank will not be overstocked, i assure you  i will leave room on the front and back in case i do wan a tang later on. That will be when my tank is very established, peobably the last fish i will add, if i do want one. Thanks guys! I will only even CONSIDER bristletooth tangs
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 09:47 PM
|
#17
|
Aquarium Advice Freak
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nu-Nu the eel
Alright thanks! Well i dont plan on having any other grazers, and my tank will not be overstocked, i assure you  i will leave room on the front and back in case i do wan a tang later on. That will be when my tank is very established, peobably the last fish i will add, if i do want one. Thanks guys! I will only even CONSIDER bristletooth tangs 
|
 Sound like a plan.
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 09:49 PM
|
#18
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: So Cal
Posts: 5,455
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShooterRick
 Sound like a plan.
|
On a side note, do you think this is a good tank? High quality? I have never seen one before and i am wondering if it would be a good upgrade for my fish  thanks for all your help people!
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 09:58 PM
|
#19
|
Aquarium Advice Freak
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nu-Nu the eel
On a side note, do you think this is a good tank? High quality? I have never seen one before and i am wondering if it would be a good upgrade for my fish  thanks for all your help people!
|
First I have no experience with the Red Sea tanks but did consider them. I talked with a few people who have them though and this was their thoughts.
Pros: Attractive and well built, all in one systems, Support was good
Cons: All in one system leaves little room for mods, tend to run on the hot side temp wise and needed a chiller-One guy proped the lid open and used a fan which created more top offs. Expensive.
Again this is not hands on info but I choose to buy a used system that I could build and modifiy to my wants. I picked up a 72 bow front Oceanic tank, stand and lots of equipment for under 100.00 of craigs list and put my money into good rock and upgrades.
__________________
|
|
|
04-01-2012, 09:59 PM
|
#20
|
Aquarium Advice Addict


Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 10,296
|
38" tank= essentially a 3' tank= not recommended for a tang of any kind IMO.
I worked at a shop that sold earlier models of these. We had one or two come back for electrical issues ("power center" failed and components that were plugged in didn't function properly- certainly disappointing for the high price of the unit). The good news is, customer service was responsive and replaced defective parts. I will say this was several years ago before this particular model was produced, so hopefully quality has improved.
|
|
|
 |
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|

» Vendor Spotlight (Deals & More) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Photo Contest Winners |
|
» Saltwater Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Freshwater Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Other Discussions & Classifieds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|