Natural Aquarium?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone with an interest in aquariums or fish keeping!
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

TankGirl

Aquarium Advice Addict
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
8,974
Location
Richmond VA
Anyone here using the "natural aquarium" method, i.e. no powered filtration?

On another board I moderate one of the members is very heavily into this method (he is a member at naturalaquariums.com) and he has finally talked me into trying it.

The idea is that heavy planting and vigorous plant growth will uptake all waste produced by the fish, and in turn produce enough oxygen to support the fish, without any kind of externally powered filtration. Lots of people run tanks like this with great success, so I was interested in trying it with my Endler's tank. I recently unplugged the filter in my 5.5gal, since it has very vigorous, thick plant growth and not a very heavy stock of fish. So far after two days of nothing but a heater and about 2.5wpg fluorescent lighting the fish appear to be doing fine. I will be following my usual practice of 50% water changes weekly and daily dose of Flourish Excel.

This is a fishkeeping method that can't be done with any tank, and can't be done with any kind of fish, but I was curious if any of our members here on AA are doing this, or are familiar with this practice.

Sign me,
Walking on the wild side
 
I've a cousin that runs a nature preserve in NJ. He has a 55 gallon tank with pond life from the preserve. He doesn't even feed the tank. Personally, I don't see any joy in keeping a tank like that. Come to think of it, the tank is murky I can hardly see in it. :lol: :lol:
 
Just wondering why this is considered natrual if u still have to use heaters and lights,? Sounds like a fun thing to try out, and in SW that is common useing a DSB with a possible plenum, LR, some may use pumps for airation, but others dont
 
I love this idea, I've been wondering about this my self. In my reef it's just live rock and caulerpa doing all the filtration, and I have wanted to get a planted tank going with this same idea in mind. I have a friend out of state that I am getting a 125 gallon acrylic tank from and this is my plan for filtration: fully plant the tank beyond belief, then run a 30 gallon sump which will house more plants, snails, f/w clams, ghost shrimp and crayfish. I think with the right amount of water movement, combined with the right balance of livestock/waste removal methods can work, but you must have tons of water flow. I don't think this is mechanical filtration, just powerheads and pumps, am I right? Sounds like a great experiment.
 
TankGirl, just curious -- what kind of filter do you have in the 5.5 gallon? Mine have sponge filters, which don't provide a lot of water flow, but that's ok, since they're betta tanks.
 
TankGirl, FWIW I'm trying it in a 2.5g (female betta, anacharis, hornwort, java moss, low light/ambient sunlight) w/ 2 cups of water changed every other day and no current. Plants grow pretty quickly and nitrates are added for a positive test reading. The Betta is active and seems fine. There is a persistent green water and hard green algae problem. Inner tank walls are cleaned regularly to keep visibility. Plants must be shaken to dislodge build-up. Frankly, my "natural" tank is more high maintenence than interesting. Will you have a clean-up crew in your tank? Perhaps a good algae eater and/or filter feeder (fw clam?) in a bigger tank with proper lighting would solve my problems.

PatM, that's a very interesting experiment :) Just a thought: how about a mountainside-like paludarium in the 125g? Sump return feeds chambers and looks like a river flowing downstream, and drain bulkhead is in a pool at the bottom. Fast, natural waterflow with no powerheads or visible pump.
 
Yeah czcz I definitely don't want to see any equipment in the tank but I think that water movement is very important. You won't keep water clean without it, IMO. I have thought about the land/water idea, since I have a turtle who could always use a bigger home, but I really want to house the cichlids I have, which aren't too many and would be considered a light load in a 125. Though they are a heavy load in my 29 (I won't say how many, just that I change water every other day to keep water tolerable) so I think I'll probably go all water. I guess it's not totally natural but there will be no carbon or other junk in there, I'm slowly realizing after all these years that that stuff just seems to hold the nitrates, I want to get them out naturally. Keep us posted on your experiment, I saw your progress, looks promising, though loots of work.
 
If you look in the gallery at naturalaquarium.com you will see the tanks are not murky, but look like a typical planted tank. I think when you have the balance right of light and bioload and plants you don't have problems with algae and whatnot. You can easily mess this up, as can happen to all of us no matter what equipment we have running.

I have a Penguin Mini on the 5.5gal, and I simply unplugged it for this experiment. Believe me, this whole concept is an anathema to me - and the subject of much hand-wringing. My buddy has been pestering me and pestering me, basically calling me "yella" (and a "bubble lover" - a most scathing insult) so I had to try it to save face. :wink:

I'm not ready to unplug my 55gal, though I think the dense planting and the high light/CO2 would probably make it a most excellent candidate. Several members of the Endler's forum http://www.endlersr.us/index.php have unplugged their 55gals and are keeping everybody posted with the results.

My husband thinks I have gone off the deep end, no lie, and though he is extremely supportive of my hobby this one has given him pause. It is probably one of the most radical things I have done with any tank in 22 years of keeping fish, so I'll be monitoring things very carefully. The first sign of oxygen deprivation and I'm first going to move out some of the population before I resort to turning the filter back on. I have a ramshorn snail and cherry shrimp in this tank currently for scavenging, BTW.

There is nothing "natural" about a glass box with no water movement at all, so this label is misleading. I don't think what I have in my tank is a replica of nature at all, in any way, but that is how it is referred to on the web so I use the term here so folks can google it and see what they come up with. Sometimes I get tired of the splashing sound on that tiny tank, sitting on my kitchen counter, and if the fish swimming and the plants growing is adequate to maintain the tank like it has been, then I'm all for unplugging it.

czcz - I'd quit dosing nitrate and see what happens. Your fish is producing the nitrate that ought to be adequate, so rather than dose for test results, let the fish provide the dosing and only add ferts if the plants seem to be struggling. The goal here is to make the plants your "filter" so many practitioners of this method dose no ferts at all.

This concept is wholly a planted tank method, so maybe I should have posted in the planted forum, but I wanted to get a general idea of how familiar the average fishkeeper was with this practice.
 
Thanks Pat, I'll post sump progress soon (really just increasing one-way current in the main tank). How many gph do you think you'll need to move through your project to provide adequate current, with no powerhead? How about multiple bulkheads and return pumps and do it all with the sump? I don't know, but I'd think no filter floss/mechanical/chemical filtration makes that hi-tech yet natural ;)

Edit - Ah, I see. Thanks TankGirl; I will follow your suggestion. I started dosing nitrates when I first noticed the algae problem and didn't have a positive test. Perhaps I've been making the problem worse.
 
Sounds like a nice experiment to me, and I think you will find that it can be done tankgirl. I would love to do the same thing, but I don't have enough 'other' equipment to try (high enough lighting). Keep us updated on your progress!

I don't see why people would be 'against' the idea of going without filtration. What's the downside? Anyone who's not for this can give a decent arguement as to why? This keeping in mind the tank specs Tankgirl gave.
 
wow this is very interesting. being kind of a newbie to this whole thing i cant wait to hear more about it how ever i doubt this is for me none of my tanks or fish are suited for this sort of thing.

but please keep this thread updated wold love to know more

side note- is this at all possible for a outdoor pond- what would it take to make that work.
 
I have no reason to think it would not work outside, with the sun providing the best source for plant growth, but I think algae would be a much more serious issue, and harder to control, without our ability to limit light for indoor tanks. You would also need to keep the surface disturbed to prevent overpopulation of mosquitoes, etc.

So far I am seeing no signs of distress in my 5.5gal, and everything is as normal, but we shall see!
 
Isn't this call a Dutch tank? I remember reading about something like that in a book ... no filters, but I think you can have water movement with a power head or whatnot.

Come to think of it, I think Fruitbat has several dutch tanks ... tho I haven't seen his post for a while now ....
 
Strictly speaking, Dutch just means the plants are the focus of the tank, rather than the fish, so that it looks like a terrestrial garden, just under water. I think it was our buddy Rex Grigg who used to say he did not keep "fish tanks" but "planted tanks."There are probably many Dutch tanks that use the natural aquarium method, though, and it may have started out that way, but what most people are calling Dutch aquariums nowadays are filtered in the typical fashion.

Diana Walstad keeps several natural aquariums, or at least she used to, with water pumps circulating the water. Many of the people I have chatted with do not even do that, with a perfectly still tank, save the fish. I think if I decided I was going to convert my 55gal, for instance, I would rig up some pumps throughout the tank.

The other thing prevalent amongst natural aquariums is manure, potting soil and the like in the substrate. Since you don't gravel vac these tanks, allowing the mulm to feed the plants, you theoretically don't disturb the substrate so it is not a problem, but mine is not set up that way. Plus, I have to rearrange and re-plant things as they grow and mature, so it would likely wind up a mess.

It is funny how turning off one tank suddenly makes all of the other tanks in the house seem so noisy! :?
 
You could, and I know some do this with canister filters. For me, the tank is small enough that it does not seem to be necessary. It is nice not to have the trickling noise of the HOB.
 
My only concern would be aeration, not so much filtration....even with the plants providing oxygen, it would seem that the fish would prefer some type of current?
 
That is why it is important to choose your fish carefully. My Endler's do not seem to require any current at all. Bettas and other labyrinth fish do not prefer current, and also do better in lower O2 situations. Killies seem to be favored fish for this kind of setup as well.

The plants should produce enough O2 to keep the fish happy, but keeping the tank slightly understocked is recommended.
 
It would be cool to try using a "natural light" setting as well.....heater would be necessary unless you live in tropical climate....it would be neat to have an aquarium not assisted by electricity so to speak. As natural as it could be in a glass box.... Keep us posted! This is very intriguing! 8)
 
Back
Top Bottom