View Poll Results: which is best for a 40g
|
power filter
|
  
|
10 |
50.00% |
undergravel filter
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
canister filter
|
  
|
10 |
50.00% |
 |
04-23-2005, 01:53 AM
|
#1
|
Aquarium Advice FINatic
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 525
|
filter?
i am confused which is best
i bought a aquaclear 200
__________________
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 01:57 AM
|
#2
|
God of primitive fishes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 8,163
|
For overall flexibility, powerfilter.
__________________
G. A. Christian Bilou, Herpetologist
Founder/Director, Reptile Rescue Alberta
Past-President, Calgary Aquarium Society
www.calgaryaquariumsociety.com
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 03:08 AM
|
#3
|
Aquarium Advice FINatic
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 525
|
lol no one but Toirtis gave a reason why
__________________
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 04:11 AM
|
#4
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,490
|
I have power filters on all my tanks and they work great.
__________________
Current fish (includes all 3 running tanks): Polypterids, severums (of which I raised from eggs), gouramis, plecos (gold spot ones & a gurupa), loaches (zebras, yoyos, & a kubotai), macculocchi spotted silver dollars, an African butterfly fish, & Ctenopomas (a leopard & an ansorgii)
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 11:17 AM
|
#5
|
Aquarium Advice Addict


Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 10,296
|
I'd use a power filter simply because it better fits into my budget, but a canister is also a great choice. Skip the UGF though, they are essentially just outdated waste traps and a power filter or canister will be much better for you. The Aquaclear 200 will probably be ok but I personally would have picked the AC 300 instead, as I like to turn my water over about 10 times per hour if possible (the 300 wouldn't do this either, but the next size up is the 500 and that would just be overkill). Or if you want you could add a second AC 200 for a total of 400 gph, but it wouldn't really be necessary I'm sure, just a personal preference of mine.
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 11:38 AM
|
#6
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Palm Bay Fl
Posts: 4,075
|
IMO the canister filter is the best. It holds tons of media and you have the chioce of what media to use. They also can filter tons of water and they make it so you can put your tank right up aginst the wall.
Power filters are cheaper and they do work very well but you need to leave the tank out a good ways from the wall.
Undergravel filters are just way out dated and a waste trap as already stated.
I wouldn't waste my money.
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 03:28 PM
|
#7
|
Aquarium Advice Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 20
|
I vote for canister overall, especially for planted tanks. (same reasons as
oscarbreeder) However power filters work well otherwise and are cheaper.
__________________
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 04:41 PM
|
#8
|
AA Team Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New York, NY (The Big Apple)
Posts: 14,951
|
I have a power filter on my 30g and a canister on my 75g.
Power Filter - Great for keeping tank water clear and has an absolutely amazing ease of maintenance.
Canister - A larger amount of filtration for the size of the tank. Massive amount of media baskets. Also, makes the tank footprint a lot smaller as you don't need as much room in the rear of the tank. I saved 4".
__________________
_________________________________
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 04:44 PM
|
#9
|
Guest
|
Canister: quieter, less maintenance, and more flexable.
__________________
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 05:14 PM
|
#10
|
Aquarium Advice Addict


Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 10,296
|
Aquaclears require very little maintenance. They don't have those cartridges that you have to change, you can just rinse the sponge block in tankwater during PWCs every once in a while.
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 06:12 PM
|
#11
|
Guest
|
I love my aquaclear 300gph, with my 55 gallon. I agree that UG filters are horrible, i had one and it felt like all i ever did was siphon junk out of the gravel. Now ive got all live plants and my power filter and its so much easier to maintain. I would love to invest in a canister filter in the future becasue i heard they are wonderful.
__________________
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 09:44 PM
|
#12
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: texas
Posts: 1,510
|
Power filters are best imo. You can use them on fw or sw. You can put whatever you want in it. I have 2 sw tanks and use the Tetratec 500 with built-in 200w heater on each. They are both filled with live rock rubble and any other media I need to add temporarily(carbon, chemipure, etc). I also have an aquaclear300 modded into a fuge and it works great.
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 10:51 PM
|
#13
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by electrikat
Power filters are best imo. You can use them on fw or sw. You can put whatever you want in it.
|
How is this an argument for power filters? You can do the same with canisters, and only the really top of the line Power filters allow for much variety at all in media.
__________________
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 10:53 PM
|
#14
|
Guest
|
i would have to say canister filter
dont know why, i just recommend them because IMO the clean the water a heck of alot better than normal power filters
__________________
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 10:56 PM
|
#15
|
Guest
|
I think people are defending power filters because they have them on their tanks. I did too for a long time, and they work great. Now I have a canister and it works even better. You can't go wrong with either, but a good canister filter is the best.
__________________
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 11:05 PM
|
#16
|
Aquarium Advice Addict
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: texas
Posts: 1,510
|
It wasn't intended to be an argument just a statement about how I feel about my filters. I happen to like the hang on tank filters. I like knowing the water will probably not be able to get out of the tank. The few canister filters I have seen with my own eyes have been under the tank with hoses running to and from the tank. I don't really trust anything that is external to the tank. I have a sump on my 90g with an overflow box, and it is the only source of stress to me. I am constantly checking to be sure the flow hasn't stopped and water isn't about to overflow. The canisters might filter marginally better but to me it is just not worth the added worry. I also like that my heater is in the filter and heats all the water evenly. Again, it all comes down to personal opinion.
|
|
|
04-23-2005, 11:46 PM
|
#17
|
Aquarium Advice FINatic
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 525
|
i guess it all depends on how much you want to mess with the filter uh electrikat
__________________
|
|
|
04-24-2005, 12:07 AM
|
#18
|
Aquarium Advice Freak
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Port Jefferson Station, New York
Posts: 283
|
Cannisters are great for their biological,mechanical abilities.Less maintenance another advantage over other type filters.
__________________
|
|
|
 |
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|

» Vendor Spotlight (Deals & More) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Photo Contest Winners |
|
» Saltwater Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Freshwater Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Other Discussions & Classifieds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|