Recent content by Aquamemnon

Sparky wrote: I am one of those with a modem. I may be a technophile, but I also watch my pocket book. The benefit/cost ratio still doesn't warrant me going out and getting a high-speed connection. But I do have access to high-speed connection at work :) Now if work only paid me to browse...

some info... http://www.advancedaquarist.com/issues/april2004/feature.htm http://www.reefkeeping.com/issues/2002-10/nftt/ I hope these can help

For what it is worth....I got a 32gal s/w aquarium in April 2000. I would say that I am cheep and hardly spend much on my tank. None the less this is what it costed me over the last couple of years: 2000 = $642.23 new lights, filters, live rock, etc. The fish were the cheapest part except...

How about creating an "AquariumAdvice" library, in the vein of the calculators above. It would be a work in progress as items are added, but it would be a great repository of information. And yes, it should include how a word is pronounced. Another advantage is that hyperlinks could be added...

From Reefrunner Could you elaborate on why these would be the problems if one followed the watts per gallon method. And if the w/g method is so bad, does any one have a better method? I am most curious as to why PCs would "burn corals."

Thanks all, for the good information...my paranoia is now limited to that cabal of fish in my tank.

I recently purchased a 90 gal SW aquarium. The center of gravity is about 40" off the ground and the base is 20" wide (10" from center). I am unsure about the effect of water sloshing about affecting the balance of the aquarium. No, I am not snorkeling in my aquarium, but I do live 1 mile...

That is, as far as I am concerned, the best reason for going out and getting live rock. It feals like finding gold in California. My latest acquisition turned out to have a couple of 1/2" dia. anemones. My best find was an ugly rock that sprouted octal-corals a month later.