Ammonia spike

The friendliest place on the web for anyone with an interest in aquariums or fish keeping!
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

PUMPKY90

Aquarium Advice Apprentice
Joined
Nov 25, 2025
Messages
32
Location
Pennsylvania
My cycled since later October 10 gallon tank which has been going great had an ammonia spike. I seen my black Molly almost dead at bottom of tank when I came home. I added seachem prime and some pristine to try and help. My platty is fine thank god. What would cause an ammonia spike? There is no live plants, no fish or other critters that died. Water is clear.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7285.jpeg
    IMG_7285.jpeg
    163 KB · Views: 2
How often do you do water changes? Clean filter ?

Have you added any new livestock recently?
 
How often do you do water changes? Clean filter ?

Have you added any new livestock recently?
No new livestock. I've had both fish since October. I replaced the filter 2 weeks ago. Saturday I did amount a 15 percent water change but I used seachem prime like I always have. I'm puzzled and saddened that it appears my Molly will probably die
 
What is the ammonia level now?
Any cats ? Haven't sprayed any aerosols near tank did you ?
 
No new livestock. I've had both fish since October. I replaced the filter 2 weeks ago. Saturday I did amount a 15 percent water change but I used seachem prime like I always have. I'm puzzled and saddened that it appears my Molly will probably die
When you say you replaced the filter, did you mean you replaced the filter cartridge?
 
Great catch I'm currently hopped up on pain meds 🤣🤣🤣
 
Yes just the cartridge
I'd put money on a bet that that is why you have an ammonia spike. The nitrifying microbes live on surfaces where the highest levels of oxygenated water is and that most often is in the filter. The filter cartridges is where the majority of the surface where they will be. When you replaced the old cartridge, you threw away a big colony of your biological filter bed. In the future, even tho the companies say to replace the cartridges, do not replace them until they are literally falling apart. Gently rinse them off in tank water to get the "gunk" off without destroying the microbes and then put it back into the filter. This is best done when you do your water changes so that you have tank water you are getting rid of. As long as you have water going though the cartridges, you are good to go. (y) When you see the cartridge is starting to fall apart, place a replacement cartridge between the old cartridge and the outflow so that the nitrifying microbes can transfer from the old cartridge to the new one. Do this 2-3 weeks before you totally replace the old cartridge. The longer the better so that your new cartridge gets a good colony growing in it. (y) That should prevent any ammonia spikes as long as you don't overload the tank. ;)

What you need to do now is recycle the tank. First however, you need to get the ammonia level down to a safer level for the fish to survive. Start by doing a 50% water change which should get your ammonia from 3 to 1.5. About 2 hours later, do another 50% water change which should get it down to .75. In another 2-3 hours later, do another 50% water change that should get the ammonia to approx .37. That is a safer level for the fish. From there, you'll want to keep tabs on the ammonia level to keep it under .5 ppm. Do appropriate water changes to keep the level below .5 ppm. The PRIME is fine to help dechlorinate your water but it's effects on ammonia ( detoxifying it as they claim) only lasts for 24-48 hours so its better to do water changes to remove the ammonia, not just detoxify it temporarily. You can also try using one of these Bacteria in a bottle products to help speed up the cycling process. Only Fritzyme #7 and Fritz Turbo 700, Tetra brand SafeStart and Dr Tim's one and only are the only products that passed a test for being effective. The other brands of these bacteria in a bottle products did not show live cultures when they were tested. So these can help speed up the process. (y)
 
Last edited:
I have two filter boxes hanging outside of my 20 gallon tall tank. Inside each box in addition to the filter cartridge I have those round hollow ceramic things ( not sure what they are called). So a rough estimate is the filter cartridge holds approx 50% of the bacteria in each box. So if I replace a filter cartridge, I’m only removing approx 25% of the bacteria in the tank. Not enough to cause any spikes in harmful chemicals. Actually considering there are bacteria in the water and on aquarium surfaces that 25% loss is probably lower. My point is it’s better to have two smaller filters than one larger one.
 
I have two filter boxes hanging outside of my 20 gallon tall tank. Inside each box in addition to the filter cartridge I have those round hollow ceramic things ( not sure what they are called). So a rough estimate is the filter cartridge holds approx 50% of the bacteria in each box. So if I replace a filter cartridge, I’m only removing approx 25% of the bacteria in the tank. Not enough to cause any spikes in harmful chemicals. Actually considering there are bacteria in the water and on aquarium surfaces that 25% loss is probably lower. My point is it’s better to have two smaller filters than one larger one.
What matters is the amount of oxygenated water is in the area, not how much bacteria holding materials are present. For example, if you were take a simple 10 gallon tank and placed a filter cartridge inside the water on one side of it and a small air stone on the opposite side of the tank, the majority of the nitrifying microbes would be near the air stone, not the filter cartridge. There is a very simple way of replacing those HOB filter cartridges without damaging the nitrifying bed and that is to put the replacement pad in the filter for some time before removing the old filter. And with that said, the old method of depending on carbon or charcoal for cleaning the water has kind of gone by the wayside and the push by HOB companies for changing those cartridges seems more a means to sell more product than it is for the health of the aquarium. This proved out with the "invention" of the DLS material first used in saltwater tanks many years ago. They had zero carbon or charcoal in the setup and the tanks remained healthy without them. You never replaced that material until the floss part was literally falling apart which took months to years. The microbes would be sitting on the outer "screen" that DLS used and would transfer/ repopulate onto the floss with time as oxygenated water went through it. So the 2 is better than one idea you are expressing is not necessarily the best. It all depends on what you are using. And with that said, ;) in my hatcheries, I used both a sponge filter and a box filter in each tank. This was not for extra filtration but for security if one of the filters failed to work ( i.e. sponge filter got clogged, box filter airline got clogged ), the other was running. The only way they both failed was if the compressor went down.
 
What matters is the amount of oxygenated water is in the area, not how much bacteria holding materials are present. For example, if you were take a simple 10 gallon tank and placed a filter cartridge inside the water on one side of it and a small air stone on the opposite side of the tank, the majority of the nitrifying microbes would be near the air stone, not the filter cartridge. There is a very simple way of replacing those HOB filter cartridges without damaging the nitrifying bed and that is to put the replacement pad in the filter for some time before removing the old filter. And with that said, the old method of depending on carbon or charcoal for cleaning the water has kind of gone by the wayside and the push by HOB companies for changing those cartridges seems more a means to sell more product than it is for the health of the aquarium. This proved out with the "invention" of the DLS material first used in saltwater tanks many years ago. They had zero carbon or charcoal in the setup and the tanks remained healthy without them. You never replaced that material until the floss part was literally falling apart which took months to years. The microbes would be sitting on the outer "screen" that DLS used and would transfer/ repopulate onto the floss with time as oxygenated water went through it. So the 2 is better than one idea you are expressing is not necessarily the best. It all depends on what you are using. And with that said, ;) in my hatcheries, I used both a sponge filter and a box filter in each tank. This was not for extra filtration but for security if one of the filters failed to work ( i.e. sponge filter got clogged, box filter airline got clogged ), the other was running. The only way they both failed was if the compressor went down.
Thanks for all the advice and knowledge
 
Back
Top Bottom