125 reef build

The friendliest place on the web for anyone with an interest in aquariums or fish keeping!
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
You may also want to consider raising them a bit. I know with the Lumebrights it was found they need to be mounted much higher off the surface of the water to get the best results.

Neilan is correct though, having a PAR meter and getting some actual numbers would be pretty cool.
 
You may also want to consider raising them a bit. I know with the Lumebrights it was found they need to be mounted much higher off the surface of the water to get the best results.

Neilan is correct though, having a PAR meter and getting some actual numbers would be pretty cool.
How high do you think they are off the water...and how high do you think they should be? These are not Lumenbrights. They are a totally different design. These are the same design as LumenArc III minis. What's the recommend height for LA's vs LB's?

Buy a PAR meter and send it over. I'll try it out and send it back. :)
If you check Sanjay article on reflector performance, the same bulb/ballast combo on parallel reflectors maxed out at 800 PAR and with LA's it maxed out at 2400 PAR.

Here's Sanjay's latest article on LumenArc III, LumenMax, LumenMax Elite and LumenBrights.
From the article....
"The reflectors seem to fall into 2 separate groups, Group 1, the Lumenarc and the Lumenmax and Group 2 comprising Lumen Brite and Lumenmax Elite. The Group 1 reflectors seem to be better at providing a wider coverage, whereas the group 2 reflectors tend to focus the light slightly more creating higher peak values and smaller spread."
In other words, LumenArc and LumenMax can be mounted lower and LumenBright and LM Elite higher.
 
I don't agree with his test numbers. They are not real to what actually happens in your tank. That grid he used to test was not under water with flow. It was in open air. IMO that doesn't count for what a bulb/reflector generates in real tank situations.

Take a PAR meter and test a bulb in open air on the grid and you will get the maximum the bulb/reflector can generate. Take the same combination of reflector and bulb and test it in a tank with water in it and you get a totally different set of numbers. I seriously doubt you will get any where near 2400 PAR in your tank. With the bulb ballast and reflector combination you have I expect your numbers are more like 700-800 at the surface (1/2" or so below the water) and drop off to around 200-300 at the sand bed. Again all of that changes with flow and ripple effect and how clear you water is.

Those tests are great to get an idea of what bulbs and reflectors can produce but I don't think they are as accurate as they could be.

BTW...Lumenbrights are supposed to be mounted 14-18" off the surface of the water. I understand they are not the same as what you built.
 
Ziggy the hobbyist is allowed to disagree with Dr. Sanjay Joshi, PhD (Industrial Engineering) and his methodologies. ;) If you read some of his many articles (which obviously you haven't), you will see water has an across the board affect. It does not affect 1 reflector performance more than another. So if water prevents, for example, 10% of the possible light penetration in 6" of water, it's 10% for every reflector. What would the benefit be testing under water as far as the differences in performance...which is what his tests are all about. The difference in performance. This is all mentioned in his articles if you take the time to actually read them and not just look at the pics and graphs.

I find Sanjay's work an invaluable tool in selecting lighting. I can look at 2 bulbs and compare their output and choose what I want and know how that bulb performs. I can then take that and apply it to reflector performance. If the bulb I choose gets 75 PPFD per Sanjay's test (which are done with no reflector), I can trust that the performance of that bulb will react the same as the results in the reflector tests. If it gets 100 PPFD with a parallel reflector, I believe it will get 300 PPFD with a LumenArc, per Sanjay's test results. You just have to understand, these are all tests done to show the differences in performance. Real numbers in a tank at 6" deep may only be 50 PPFD and 150 PPFD, but the ratio (3:1) does not change.

When I was building my system, I asked Sanjay for recommendations on my lighting including what kind of reflectors to use. In fact, I think way back in this thread I mentioned I asked him about my lighting. I think I'll take the advice of Dr. Joshi. ;)

BTW...my bulbs are 12" above the water.
 
Last edited:
I think I might be all DIY'ed out on my build. I finally added the last thing I needed to do....an ATO. I bought the double switch sump model from www.autotopoff.com.

The bottom switch controls the water level in the sump. The upper 1 is a safety shutoff incase the lower switch fails.
ato1_5-09.jpg


This is my 28g RO/DI storage container. The powerhead is controlled by the ATO. The float valve is connected to my RO/DI to keep the container full.
ato2_5-09.jpg


Everything all setup and running.
ato3_5-09.jpg


And this is "my" section of the basement. From right to left: RO/DI container, sump, Ranco temp controller mounted on the wall, MH ballasts, DIY 2-part ingredients, test kits etc, on the far left is a 20g qt ready for my new fish and a 20g tank full of new saltwater ready for a water change.
ato4_5-09.jpg
 
When my wife and I build our house my sumps and equipment will be in the basement below the tank. It will be so nice to have room around everything to work.
 
That`s a nice set up there Larry. Everyone should see that if they have questions about a refuge.
 
Thanks Mike. It's a simple, yet effective setup.

How thick is your sand bed? How many bags did you use?
No sand in the sump and in the main tank it's anywhere from nothing where the flow blew it away to maybe 1.5". I think I used about 3 40lb bags of aragonite oolitic sand.
 
120 lbs total for a 125 isn't bad. I only used 3 20lb bags of Fiji pink and about 20lbs of tropical play sand that I had in the shed from the previous owners and my sand bed looks way to thick. BTW Great looking tank. Your side of the basement gave me some good ideas on how to set up my plumbing.
 
Too bad you don't have a PAR meter to measure the results, they look great though, good work!
I borrow a Apogee Quantum light meter from a member of my reef club. Here's the results from 6 different bulbs I tested. Not suprising is the #'s pretty much match the Performance Data from Sanjay's lighting site.
All these pics were taken with the MH lighting only and my camera set to manual, with the White Balance at 10K, so nothing changed for the pics except the light.

Iwasaki 15K
par_iwasaki15_5-09.jpg

6" below bulb out of water - 1575
1" below surface - 625
12" below surface - 325
bottom - 200

XM 10K
par_xm10_5-09.jpg

6" below bulb out of water - 1630
1" below surface - 615
12" below surface - 275
bottom - 180

Coralife 5500K
par_coralife55_5-09.jpg

6" below bulb out of water - 650
1" below surface - 310
12" below surface - 155
bottom - 110

XM15K
par_xm15_5-09.jpg

6" below bulb out of water - 500
1" below surface - 225
12" below surface - 110
bottom - 80

Ebay 14K
par_ebay14_5-09.jpg

6" below bulb out of water - 470
1" below surface - 230
12" below surface - 115
bottom - 95

Hamilton 14K
par_ham14_5-09.jpg

6" below bulb out of water - 450
1" below surface - 205
12" below surface - 95
bottom - 85
 
Seems strange that the iwasaki and XM could have so much higher values then the same wattage bulbs. Not doubting your findings, just a curious observation.
 
How did you hook up the fans to the temp controller? Where they regular fans at the sump or where they the computer fans that are in the canopy?
 
I have 2 pc fans and a regular fan in the canopy and a regular fan over the sump. The regular fan in the canopy and the 1 over the sump are plugged into the Ranco temp controller. The 2 pc fans in the canopy are on a timer with the lights.
 
:) Thanks, I saw the clip on fans in the pictures and kind of thought that was it. Just wanted to double check.
 
Back
Top Bottom