Carbon Confusion

The friendliest place on the web for anyone with an interest in aquariums or fish keeping!
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

LarryS

Aquarium Advice Activist
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Messages
168
Location
Bucks Co., PA
Cycling my first marine fowlr.... 3+ weeks. Will be adding a Reef Octopus 4 skimmer Wednesday (if it arrives...fingers crossed).

Tank: 65g with 20g sump/fuge. Lots of Pukani rock in DT; some in fuge and will be adding chaeto and some other macroalgae soon...perhaps with 1" mud? (The mud is debatable as there is so much debate on substrates in refugiums.) Will post photos.

Water is RO/DI. Salinity currently: 1.025 (but may reduce to 1.024). ASW: Reef Crystals but am going to segue to Instant Ocean starting with first pwc.

Return pump is at about 500 gph. Hydor 750 powerhead in tank.

About carbon:

I'm getting conflicting advice on using activated carbon filtration, so I am firmly on the fence - ambivalent and willing to do best practice.

Anyone with advice or experience is welcome to join in here! :)

Looking forward to the varying opinions pro & con... and how-to best do it if I were to add activated carbon filter. :thanks:
 
I run chemi pure, a carbon substitute in my tanks. In my 125g I just added a bag to the return pump section of my sump. In my other smaller tanks I use chemipure elite which also contains gfo to help with phosphates. :)

It seems to be a personal choice as to whether you use carbon or not. Me, I like it. But keep in mind regular carbon has to changed frequently to be most effective. The chemi pure is supposed to be good for several months so thats why i went with that. and so far so good. :-D
 
activated carbon from what ive read lasts only a few days to a week, so to use it effectively it can be expensive.
 
I run chemi pure, a carbon substitute in my tanks. In my 125g I just added a bag to the return pump section of my sump. In my other smaller tanks I use chemipure elite which also contains gfo to help with phosphates. :)

It seems to be a personal choice as to whether you use carbon or not. Me, I like it. But keep in mind regular carbon has to changed frequently to be most effective. The chemi pure is supposed to be good for several months so thats why i went with that. and so far so good. :-D

Carey, based on your post I did some quickie research on google and Amazon... found other products...none of which I really thought about until now...and noticed one comment from someone use Purigen that he was successfully running a reef tank without a skimmer because the Purigen was so successfully accomplishing that task.

activated carbon from what ive read lasts only a few days to a week, so to use it effectively it can be expensive.

On the face of it, it surely does seem to make sense to use something longer lasting... I do recall in my freshwater days that activated carbon did get pricey because of needing to be replenished.
 
I guess that for me it's more about what's efficient while taking into account the pros and cons of the decision. Hard to have a preference without the data (by research or experience).

So, I think the question I'm asking: if using a skimmer and all the biological filtration of live rock, substrate, and the refugium obviate the need for a carbon-like filter or is there still a benefit (that does not alter the tank chemistry)? :confused:

If yes, what exactly is the benefit above what the skimmer and biological filtration accomplish?

Any before and after stories?
 
Carbon is great at clearing up water and getting rid of things. In a reef tank I would only run carbon every now and then in a reactor because carbon is know to take out trace elements and also in a study it can lead to hlle in tangs. What you really could do to get the same affect as what carbon dose is to dose vodka along with having a skimmer. that being said I was running npx bioplastics in a reactor and ended up getting a bacteria bloom. So I put carbon in the reactor and now everything is cleared up. I say you don't need carbon but I would run it every now and then to clean up the water. Like every 3 months run it for 3 weeks.
 
I don't think Purigen could replace a skimmer in most tanks, but it is possible in the right setup (especially with lots of water changes).

Carbon removes good things and bad things. How long it lasts varies based on the quality and quantity of the carbon being used, and the supply of things in the water that can be removed. Honestly, I think the 'lasts one week', 'lasts two weeks tops', 'lasts up to a month', etc. are BS. There is simply no way to know this with all the variables in home aquariums and I think these people are just restating what they heard the last person say.

The good things that carbon removes are trace and minute, not a limiting factor in most tanks. This means that their removal will not cause any major issues in the average tank because there are other, more significant issues in the tank that are holding back the corals. The comparison with people would be like giving someone a multivitamin and then locking them in a room, there are bigger issues holding them back.

Carbon can be especially useful in tanks with leather corals or with almost any coral that takes part in chemical warfare. It is a good thing to have on hand in any tank.

What it really comes down to is your tank. I suggest you try using it for a few months and then stop for a few months. If you see no difference don't keep wasting your money on it. If you see a problem when you start or an improvement when you stop, stop using it. If you see an improvement when you start or a problem when you stop, keep using it.

Some people only use it for short periods of time, like 24 hours every two weeks. This gives the tank the benefit of removing the bad things without constantly removing the good as well.
 
Thanks guys! Great input all.

Now, I'm beginning to see why the debate... and so much (as always) depends on the tank, the mechanical and biological setup and loads.

That said, reef keeping has it's own special needs and seemingly more finicky (in it's own way) compared to fish-only, it's worth restating that I'm starting with a FOWLR setup.

I've seen fish-only tanks with and without a carbon-based or carbon-substituted products/filters. Hearing that the "carbon" or "carbon substitute" will remove good and bad, I'm inclined to go-ahead now without it...add what's needed if there is a problem, as prophylactic use can have it's own issues. Make sense?

Can the fish-only people jump in here too?
 
Two of my tanks right now are fish only and I run carbon or chemipure in them as well as my reef setups. I find it keeps the water really crystal clean and I never have any smells or anything, even when I do water changes. I'm also kind of old fashioned and from all my years of freshwater keeping I tend to think it's a good idea. I figure if it isnt' hurting anything and my tanks are the way i like them why change anything?
 
I've fish only(with just one leather,bit of xenia and a few polyps) and have never used carbon in the last few years.I do have some and an old canister filter in case I feel the need for it though.
 
Two of my tanks right now are fish only and I run carbon or chemipure in them as well as my reef setups. I find it keeps the water really crystal clean and I never have any smells or anything, even when I do water changes. I'm also kind of old fashioned and from all my years of freshwater keeping I tend to think it's a good idea. I figure if it isnt' hurting anything and my tanks are the way i like them why change anything?

Sounds like you have a dual personality. :) Which makes this valuable. Thanks!
 
Based on the research and feedback from all sources that I've looked at (product reviews and other forum...helps get a widest possible view) I'm leaning toward the Purigen. Very highly rated; reusable (a major plus!) and fairly inert insofar as adding anything to the water column from what I can see.

Purigen seems to be a favorite among fish-only fresh, salt, and with reefers. Very inexpensive to buy too.

Thanks guys! Helpful stuff. :) Getting some today.
 
vodka's cheap as well.I have a friend who has been dosing for a while now and swears by it.

I got a donation from someone today for live rock, macroalgae, some substrate, etc. They had switched to vodka awhile back and now swears by it - she's been reefing for 8 yrs. The tank is in an office building...she has the maintenance guy dose with vodka via syringe...lol Too funny...but she swears by it.

I did place one 100ml Purigen bag today between the baffles between the refugium and the return... photo here..but am concerned if the bag tears. No clue where else to place the thing.

Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • 00287 100 ml Purigen in baffle.jpg
    00287 100 ml Purigen in baffle.jpg
    147.5 KB · Views: 71
Water takes the path of least resistance. For the most part, it will flow around the bag and not thru it, so it won't really do a whole lot of good like it is.
 
Water takes the path of least resistance. For the most part, it will flow around the bag and not thru it, so it won't really do a whole lot of good like it is.

That was my concern too. But do not see where else I can use it.

That said, while I was rinsing it (prior to use, per instructions...use ro/di) Much to my surprise, I observed that even a very small flow (as slows as I could poor from a water jug) did have the water passing over the media.

Not sure if I can add more than one bag (one 100ml bag rated for 100g) without a downside? If I can, then adding one or 2 more would surely 'force' more flow through the media... with the one bag (since late afternoon yesterday) the water is clearer...less tank odor (not that it ws bad, it wasn't)...but maybe the skimmer (3rd day) is starting to have some effect too.

Open to other solutions.
 
Water takes the path of least resistance. For the most part, it will flow around the bag and not thru it, so it won't really do a whole lot of good like it is.

Would you happen to know how sound these bags...do they tear easily or are they durable? Wouldn't want the beads loose in the water column.
 
Back
Top Bottom