Wy Renegade
Aquarium Advice Addict
Same plant, although there is the normal and a thin-leafed version. Not sure if both types associate with cyanobacteria.
self-sustaining (or at least without water changes) without plants ...
1) expect a ton of algae
either a deep sand bed, or live rock
---
parrot fish ... not that it's part of their diet, but don't they munch on coral at times ?
for coral, ... i would recommend avoiding the DSB, going live rock and bare bottom tank
coral is really iffy about the idea of considering self-sustaining, ... there is no way i could imagine doing it as the coral itself will grow and need mineral suppliments.
my familiarity with reef tanks and nutrient levels, ... high nutrient levels upset the algae/coral relationship, ... one dies, then the other
without coral, or possibly with soft coral only it's an idea
without plants, all the nutrients are going to go somewhere
if you have plants the plants are going to use what they can, if you don't have plants, then you'll get algae.
Plants will not use NO2 for the record.
They will remove the NH4 first, then if the bacteria are lucky they might get a little, or if you over stock the tank you get an excess of NH4 which triggers algae to bloom.
Wet dry filters are very good for NH4=> NO3 so these are often used in plant tanks with high fish/feeding loads and tend to have more regular food supply for the nitrying bacteria, hence a larger bacterial bed.
These tanks are less prone to algae outbreaks when you remove plants etc, but they are tougher to balance than folks that have less fish/feeding.
It's easy to top off a planted tank's needs by adding KNO3 etc, it's very difficult to remove NH4 that's beyond the plant's uptake capacity even if you have good filtration etc, there's still some left for the alkgae to use.
Available NH4 is MUCH more valuable to a small alga than to a plant.
Why? For the same reason a big meal is better for a mouse than a peanut is for an elephant, the algae has less needs and gains more from the more available form.
This not only occurs with algae vs plants, this occurs with small algae vs large algae. Larger algae need more nutrients to sustain growth and be competitive.
While plants prefer one vs another, in practical terms plants and algae get both. Minimizing NH4 is a good goal and keeping good nutrient parameters will allow max NH4 uptake. The relatively safe method is using Fish/snail waste as the source of NH4. NO3 is relatively benign so topping off the plant's needs is generally the best approach rather than saying plants prefer NH4 vs NO3, they actually prefer a balance of both of these ions, eg they grow better when both are supplied vs either added alone.
Also, if you starve the plants by NOT adding NO3 from an inorganic source, this does NOT increase NH4 uptake. It hurts the plants once they remove what little NH4 is there or their Nitrogen needs are not able to be met so they will not make the enzymes needed to take the NH4 in the first place.
Let the plants decide what source they want and minimize the NH4.
If this NH4 preference really worked so well, why not just keep adding fish to supply all the Nitrogen needs?
You cannot blame PO4, K, Fe etc, we add those, you cannot blame NO3 becuase we also add those. The only thing that we don't add, NH4, fish waste/urea except in small continous amounts.
You can do this experiment yourself, add NH4, even a small amount and see. Next add only NO3, no fish/snails etc. Then try adding a few fish, then a few more, then a few more, till you start seeing algae. PO4 can be the same in both tanks, NO3 also. But if the NH4 waste cannot be broken down fast enough, then you will algae.
Regards,
Tom Barr
from wiki, ... related to carp ?, ... hmmm, i wonder if they're like golfish, if it can fit in their mouth they'll eat it.
doesn't change what i have in the tank, but would open up more plants i think
flagfish seem to be limited on plants