Ill give you the part about buying bad realestate due to deceptive sellers. The part about drugs though I would have to argue it would depend on why the felt they needed to take these drugs. I know fen-fen is a diet pill or at least was sold as one. If your taking it because you blaim fastfood for making you fat then thats different than taking it due to a naturally low metabolisum.
With drug companies whos less ethical? Merck for taking a drug off the market because their own extended studies showed potental increas in heartattacks or Phizer who keeps an equivlent drug on the market when extended studies show simular results yet the company claims that if the drug is taken as recommended by the company there are minimal health risks. Personally I think Merck is more ethical as they removed the product from the market not because it was killing people for being used correctly but because way to many docs where perscribing it inproperly.
Whos getting the tail sued off them now... Merck while Phizer pushes to get medicare to cover 'the little purple pill'.
With drug companies whos less ethical? Merck for taking a drug off the market because their own extended studies showed potental increas in heartattacks or Phizer who keeps an equivlent drug on the market when extended studies show simular results yet the company claims that if the drug is taken as recommended by the company there are minimal health risks. Personally I think Merck is more ethical as they removed the product from the market not because it was killing people for being used correctly but because way to many docs where perscribing it inproperly.
Whos getting the tail sued off them now... Merck while Phizer pushes to get medicare to cover 'the little purple pill'.