alex07 said:Good, how many fish are in your tank at the moment?
4 two angel a betta abd algae eater
alex07 said:Good, how many fish are in your tank at the moment?
huma-huma said:not to get too far of the OT topic but i dont understand why people get so bet out of shape about a fish-in cycle. So instead of telling him to persistantly monitor the parameters and do pwc's as necessary, you want him to put the betta in a completely under-sized bowl while he cycles the main tank? the bowl is gona be uncycled too, therefore just creating twice as much work and getting absolutely nothing accomplished. Mahoney, just monitor the parameters of the water ATLEAST 1 time a day, preferably twice... and do pwc's as needed.
Mahoney said:4 two angel a betta abd algae eater
huma-huma said:but if he has 2 angels and an algae eater, theres no sense in moving 1 fish out of the tank, thats just extra unneccessary work. as for testing twice a day, thats what i do, and i completely agree, which is why i caps locked ATLEAST hinting that multiple testings should be done.
Why would you do a fishin cycle with a betta when you can put the betta in a bowl and do a fishless cycle? Fishless is much less work and you'll be cycled in less time
Sorry but I disagree about testing once a day, when you are cycling you need to test at least twice a day. Specially since he has fish
alex07 said:Did you just get the angels?
huma-huma said:not to get too far of the OT topic but i dont understand why people get so bet out of shape about a fish-in cycle. So instead of telling him to persistantly monitor the parameters and do pwc's as necessary, you want him to put the betta in a completely under-sized bowl while he cycles the main tank? the bowl is gona be uncycled too, therefore just creating twice as much work and getting absolutely nothing accomplished. Mahoney, just monitor the parameters of the water ATLEAST 1 time a day, preferably twice... and do pwc's as needed.
roundar said:This is incredibly flawed, and I hope no beginners will take anything from this. It reflects no knowledge of the nitrogen cycle or the nature of planted tanks.
This is worse. It can be discouraging to new hobbyists, and is completely unnecessary.
I'll be happy to back this up, but not in this thread.
sillygirl423 said:Adding more fish will compound the problem more fish = more waste, not enough bacteria in your tank yet to handle the load. I don't think angels are hardy enough to withstand a cycle. AND earlier in the thread he WAS advised NOT to buy more fish (advice was ignored) I think someone was asking that previous.
Let me ask you what is the flaw about putting a betta in a bowl temporarily when I thought it was the only fish he had while his tank cycles?
Just a question though, what about the angels? I didn't think were compatible with bettas? Or good for cycling?
sillygirl423 said:Just a question though, what about the angels? I didn't think were compatible with bettas? Or good for cycling?
Coursair said:That's what I said in my post. I and others advise returning the Angels. This is only a 20H tank.
I still want to know what exact Algae Eater the OP has also.
sillygirl423 said:No he bought them yesterday to keep the betta from thinking he owned the tank. I can't keep saying it enough RESEARCH RESEARCH RESEARCH!! Really I'm pulling out of this thread, this guy was told numerous times in separate threads to get a kit, not to buy more fish until the tank cycled and research the fish he can have. Unfortunately he's not listened to most of what's been said.